Thanks Claudio :) That’s exactly what I meant. Thanks for the hint!
~~~
Ing. Alessio Arleo
Dottorando in Ingegneria Industriale e dell’Informazione
Dottore Magistrale in Ingegneria Informatica e dell’Automazione
Dottore in Ingegneria Informatica ed Elettronica
Linkedin:
Hi,
I'm not sure aggregators require necessarily high traffic. Aggregators are
aggregated locally on the worker before they are aggregated on the
(corresponding) master worker.
Anyway, assuming you want to proceed, my understanding is that you want
vertices on the same worker to share
Hello everybody
I was wondering if it was possible to extend the concept of aggregator from a
“global” to a “local-only” perspective.
Normally, aggregators DO cause network traffic because of the cycle: Workers -
Aggregator Owner- MasterAggregator - AggregatorOwner - Workers
What if I’d like
Hello everybody
I was wondering if it was possible to extend the concept of aggregator from a
“global” to a “local-only” perspective.
Normally, aggregators DO cause network traffic because of the cycle: Workers -
Aggregator Owner- MasterAggregator - AggregatorOwner - Workers
What if I’d like
Hello everybody
I was wondering if it was possible to extend the concept of aggregator from a
“global” to a “local-only” perspective.
Normally, aggregators DO cause network traffic because of the cycle: Workers -
Aggregator Owner- MasterAggregator - AggregatorOwner - Workers
What if I’d like
