Re: SSH/TELNET - Horizontal Wrapping

2017-03-24 Thread tek0011
Most telnet/ssh sessions we connect to have extremely long tables. Hence, why our entire company uses SecureCRT, because it is the only client available that can prevent wrapping. Sure putty works, and so does Guac. As you can see though, for our output, its not ideal and almost unreadable.

Re: SSH/TELNET - Horizontal Wrapping

2017-03-22 Thread tek0011
So far I have found how to prevent guac from wrapping ssh/telnet, at least through developer tools. to This does prevent wrapping in ssh/telnet and adds a scrollbar, but the scrollbar doesnt recognize the width. This also likely would mess up how rdp sessions look. Going to have some

RE: Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.

2017-03-16 Thread tek0011
But when you click back, its the exact same thing: ctrl-alt-shift -> disconnect: clicking back: Identical calls. Seems like something isnt working correctly. I can also reproduce this by actually doing ctl-alt-shift > disconnect. Then attempt a brand new connection. Same issue. I

Re: Lack of support?

2017-03-16 Thread tek0011
Open source is not an excuse. There are 100,000's of open source products that provide immeasurable support. They have taken the time to build a community. I started using this ~ 3 years ago, although sparingly and never dove into it. You had a community back on sourceforge. Look at it

RE: Lack of support?

2017-03-16 Thread tek0011
I figured this would get a response. I am not concerned about my personal support, although thats lacking as well. All I am saying is, its depression when something as amazing as this comes out, and the support and help goes away. Look at the support that was provided back when this was on

Lack of support?

2017-03-16 Thread tek0011
Is there a better place to post for support? The support for this product seems nearly non existent. It's so bad we have considered dropping it entirely. Look at the main page of the list and most posts dont have a single reply. The ones that do are usually the original poster that is replying.

Re: Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.

2016-12-15 Thread tek0011
Does this mean I should/have to use the legacy URL extension? /c seems to do nothing but fail. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Connection-errors-on-no-auth-unless-logout-first-tp93p157.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole

Re: Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.

2016-12-14 Thread tek0011
Same issue using /c. Actually if I use /c , I can't access any hosts, not even on the first try. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Connection-errors-on-no-auth-unless-logout-first-tp93p147.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole

Re: Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.

2016-12-09 Thread tek0011
Thank you for your reply. I am not using the legacy URL extension. I just simply tried *http:// guachost:9000/guacamole/#/client/* to see if it would work and it did. I will try adding the /c on Monday and report back. -- View this message in context:

Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.

2016-12-08 Thread tek0011
I use no-auth. I wrote a simple php script that checks if a server exists in noauth-config.xml. If it doesn't, it adds it and then redirects them to http://guachost:9000/guacamole/#/client/ This works all great, until I attempt to run this on the next host. Because it is using some sort of