Re: i686 support

2016-06-20 Thread Chris Nauroth
ate: Monday, June 20, 2016 at 1:18 PM To: Chris Nauroth mailto:cnaur...@hortonworks.com>>, "user@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org>" mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org>> Subject: Re: i686 support It looks like there might be many other maven-jar-plugin execut

Re: i686 support

2016-06-20 Thread Christopher
se file the JIRA > against the YARN project. > > --Chris Nauroth > > From: Christopher > Date: Monday, June 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM > > To: Chris Nauroth , "user@hadoop.apache.org" < > user@hadoop.apache.org> > Subject: Re: i686 support > > I'm still in i

Re: i686 support

2016-06-20 Thread Chris Nauroth
to:user@hadoop.apache.org>" mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org>> Subject: Re: i686 support I'm still in information-gathering mode right now... hoping somebody can tell me what the *expected* behavior of this module's build is supposed to be, so I can see exactly where there's a

Re: i686 support

2016-06-20 Thread Christopher
your findings. > > --Chris Nauroth > > From: Christopher > Date: Monday, June 20, 2016 at 12:26 PM > > To: Chris Nauroth , "user@hadoop.apache.org" < > user@hadoop.apache.org> > Subject: Re: i686 support > > As it turns out, it looks like it's

Re: i686 support

2016-06-20 Thread Chris Nauroth
ks.com>>, "user@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org>" mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org>> Subject: Re: i686 support As it turns out, it looks like it's because the version of maven-jar-plugin in Fedora was upgraded, and hadoop's build takes advantage of th

Re: i686 support

2016-06-20 Thread Christopher
oduce the problem. >> >> Is it possible that this is a problem specific to the Maven version >> running your build? The BUILDING.txt file in the root of the source tree >> has details on what tools and what versions are required for the build. >> >> --Chris N

Re: i686 support

2016-06-17 Thread Christopher
roth > > From: Christopher > Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:48 PM > To: Chris Nauroth , "user@hadoop.apache.org" < > user@hadoop.apache.org> > Subject: Re: i686 support > > Well, the error I got was: > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.mav

Re: i686 support

2016-06-16 Thread Chris Nauroth
b...@apache.org>> Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:48 PM To: Chris Nauroth mailto:cnaur...@hortonworks.com>>, "user@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org>" mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org>> Subject: Re: i686 support Well, the

Re: i686 support

2016-06-16 Thread Christopher
if that's not working, then it > might be a bug. Do you have more details on the build failure? That might > help us confirm if it's a bug, and if so, move to tracking it in an Apache > JIRA. > > --Chris Nauroth > > From: Christopher > Date: Thursday, June 16,

Re: i686 support

2016-06-16 Thread Chris Nauroth
" mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org>> Subject: i686 support Hi, Is i686 a supported arch by the upstream Hadoop developers? I'm trying to package hadoop RPMs for Fedora (reviving somebody else's previous efforts), and can't get things to build on i686. Is this normal?

i686 support

2016-06-16 Thread Christopher
Hi, Is i686 a supported arch by the upstream Hadoop developers? I'm trying to package hadoop RPMs for Fedora (reviving somebody else's previous efforts), and can't get things to build on i686. Is this normal? Does upstream care about 32-bit users? What about release testing on i686? I normally wo