Thank you everyone for the feedback. It was very helpful.
Cheers.
---
Saad Mufti
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The Hadoop KMS in 2.6 or 2.7 can be suitable for demos or prototypes but I
> would advise against using it for more than that. Recently the KMS
The Hadoop KMS in 2.6 or 2.7 can be suitable for demos or prototypes but I
would advise against using it for more than that. Recently the KMS has seen
a number of security improvements. Because it is fairly self contained, you
can check out branch-2.8 or branch-2, build everything, extract the KMS,
FWIW, you can check the set of issues CDH includes on top of whatever
upstream release it's based on:
http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh5/cdh/5/hadoop-2.6.0-cdh5.5.0.releasenotes.html
C5.5.0+ should include HADOOP-11710.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Some specificity (as I
Some specificity (as I still remember it too vividly)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11710
Our Sean got this one fixed for 2.6.1, and would by why using HDFS
transparent encryption with 2.6.0 will flat-out not work :)
On 8/18/17 1:35 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
Please see the 'Hadoop 2.6
Please see the 'Hadoop 2.6.x' bullet under
http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
FYI
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Saad Mufti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for some guidance as our security team is requiring us to
> implement encryption of our HBase data at rest and in motion. I'm reading
Hi,
I'm looking for some guidance as our security team is requiring us to
implement encryption of our HBase data at rest and in motion. I'm reading
the docs and doing research and the choice seems to be between doing it at
the HBase level or the more general HDFS level.
I am leaning towards HDFS