Hello.
Here is:
2016-03-11 08:22:11,511 ERROR [http-bio-8080-exec-3 ] ROOT -
Failed to update web session: null
javax.cache.CacheException: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException:
Failed to deserialize object with given class loader: null
at
org.apache.ignite.internal
can U tell me what will be probable error in this part as it throws after
returning listner succesfully?
code:
* cacheCfg.setCacheStoreSessionListenerFactories(new
Factory() {
@Override public CacheStoreSessionListener create() {
CacheHibernateStoreSessionListe
Hi Vladimir,
It took me a while to make a small test case but I now have one (see below)
With the setExpiryPolicyFactory method enabled the heap after operation
983Mb, with the setExpiryPolicyFactory commented out it is just 85Mb.
Simple run this class file and once you see the console messag
Kobe,
No, this is a persistence store [1] implemented using Hibernate. When the
cache is updated, it will use Hibernate session to update the database. In
case of write-through consistency is guaranteed automatically by Ignite (if
cache update fails, it will not update the database, and other way
Spark SQL queries has the same problem
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/index-and-query-org-apache-ignite-spark-IgniteRDD-String-org-apache-spark-sql-Row-tp3343p3445.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Val,
Could you tell me how this works? Is this like a L2 cache for Hibernate?
How is cache coherence maintained? Using Hibernate session listener alone?
Thanx,
/Kobe
vkulichenko wrote
> Hi Kobe,
>
> Take a look at this example:
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/examples/src/main/
It looks like we are missing an option to tell IgniteRDD to work with
binary objects. When an iterator is created, it tries to deserialize
objects, and since you do not have a corresponding class, the exception
occurs. I will create a ticket for this shortly.
Despite this, you should still be able
Bhargav,
Looks like you're still not subscribed to the mailing list. Can you please
do this? Here is the short instruction:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/mailing_list/MailingListOptions.jtp?forum=1
bhargav wrote
> Hi,
>
> Here is the link for the requested server node log
>
>
Hi Slavo,
Can you provide the whole trace (looks like it's truncated)?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/websession-clustering-problem-tp3437p3441.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Kobe,
Take a look at this example:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/examples/src/main/java-lgpl/org/apache/ignite/examples/datagrid/store/hibernate
Sounds like that's exactly what you need.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Si
I am looking for a simple illustration of using Ignite as a write-behind
cache with Hibernate (on
Oracle, not that that matters). What I have is this:
== < Hibernate> ===
I am looking to doing this:
== ** === < Hibernate> ===
I have looked through the example but am unable to fin
Hi Val,
thanks for the reply. This option has avoided the automatic re-balance on
failure. I can also see that the server reloads the cache contents when it
restarts.
Regards,
Shaun
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:33 AM, vkulichenko
wrote:
> Hi Shaun,
>
> When the node is stopped, it has to be remo
Hi All.
I'm trying use apache ignite in webapp for session clustering. Ignite starts
in webap( in tomcat 7.0.68). I see that storing websession to cache is not
problem. But there is problem get websession from cache. Here is some line
from stack:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: void
Hi Kamil,
By default TRANSACTIONAL cache invokes store from the node where
transaction is started. If this is a client node, then store will be
invoked from client. This is done on purpose to allow for transactional
writes to store. ATOMIC cache, to the contrast, do not give any
transactional guar
Hi Neil,
Could you please attach the code reproducing the problem?
Vladimir.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Neil Wightman
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been trying out ignite for the past few weeks but I am hitting a
> strange problem. I dont know if this problem is in my code or ignite.
>
> C
Thanks Igor. I used your master version of the header file and it worked!
Thanks for all your help.
Arthi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/C-Client-for-SQL-Queries-tp3407p3433.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.
Hi Dmitry,
I tried to reproduce you problem in Java using the following code, but
without success:
public class QueryListRunner {
public static void main(String[] args) {
IgniteConfiguration cfg = new IgniteConfiguration();
CacheConfiguration ccfg = new
CacheConfiguration<>();
Arthi,
It is known issue [1]. It has been fixed already and this fix is going to be
included to the next release. You can try using code from master brach
or as a workaround you can try using no-throw method version instead
i.e. QueryFieldsRow::GetNext(IgniteError& err).
[1] - https://issues.apac
Thanks Igor. It works!
I am able to read the values from the cache using the C++ client.
when I print the values from QueryFieldsCursor, I get a compilation error.
This code follows your examples -
Cache cache = grid.GetOrCreateCache("myCache");
SqlFieldsQuery qry(
"select concat(FirstName, '
Arthi,
You can just put your additional libraries to $IGNITE_HOME/libs directory.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:56 AM, arthi
wrote:
> Thanks Igor.
>
> Well, I tried using a cache config in the XML to start my C++ client. but,
> the factory store is not visible to the JNI.
>
>
Hi,
We configured partitioned, transactional cache with server and client nodes
and CacheStore which handles write-through persistence. It seems that,
however, in such model persistence logic (i.e. CacheStore.write() methods)
can be invoked in client node for certain scenarios.
After browsing p
21 matches
Mail list logo