Jaipal,
I'm also getting same issue.
Were you able to find a solution for this?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Exception-when-Ignite-server-starts-up-and-also-when-a-new-node-joins-the-cluster-tp13684p15156.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users
Hello,
I have a couple of questions on custom SQL functions:
1) Can functions be overloaded, ie. could there be a to_string( Date) and a
to_string( Double) function?
2) If yes, how is the applicable function identified? Based on parameters? Or
does the function need to be qualified with the
Hi:
As the updated data is more than 50,so I set write behind parameters to
true with java code .
but it did not work .It's still wait until all data is persisted.
When I debug the code ,I found my cache's cacheconfiguration is correctly
set to true;
the setting is:
Thanks Val,
This A is the parent table, B is children table, we want to SUM the value in B
table and set back to the A.
they join by the id, possible data like this
A:
id, total
abc, 0
xyz, 1
B:
id, count
abc, 1
abc, 2
abc, 5
xyz, 3
xyz, 1
Thanks for your time!
Regards
Aaron
Got very appreciate, thanks Mikhail!
Regards
Aaron
aa...@tophold.com
From: mcherkasov
Date: 2017-07-19 22:29
To: user
Subject: Re: How does node vistor task can work?
Hi Arron,
you use internal classes that isn't part of public api, please read this
article:
I called it from Java, and i am using Ignite 2.0.
seems many chinese developer are encountering this problem.
is there any configuration that can set as encoding? or is there any API method
can do this?
thanks,
Martin
At 2017-07-20 00:34:45, "afedotov"
One problem is that peer class loading did not match between the server and
the client (being started inside the Spark container). That required a
change in the server start up configuration because the spark client starts
with a default of "true". It was a needle in the haystack that I found
Hi,
Whats the best way to check to see if the cache data is lost (partially) ? I
was looking at 'Topology Validator' as an option.
Scenario : If there any multiple node failures occurred at the same time and
ignite loses primary and as well as backup copies of partitions and how to
know if this
You don't have table A in the subquery, I guess that's the reason for the
failure. What exactly are you trying to achieve with this query? What is the
purpose of 'WHERE b.id = a.id' clause?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
Your code works for me. What exactly do you mean by 'not working'?
And btw, you should ALWAYS call Transaction#close() in the finally block
after transaction is finished. Your current code cause unfinished
transactions and hangs.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
It looks like you didn't add Ignite libraries to Zeppelin. IgniteJdbcDriver
is included in ignite-core.jar and this JAR has to be on classpath.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Issue-with-Ignite-Zeppelin-tp14990p15144.html
Sent from the
Amit,
Default idle timeout is actually 10 minutes. Therefore connection will be
closed only it is not used for at least 10 minutes, not 30 seconds. Are you
sure that delay is caused by reopening a closed connection? If yes, are you
sure it's caused by idle timeout?
Answering your questions:
1.
Hi Amit,
Primary data storage in 2.0 is off-heap and it always has all the in-memory
data. You can have additional on-heap cache, but its generally limited and
it duplicates the off-heap data. Why don't you want to use off-heap?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
Hello Everyone,
I am using Ignite 2.0 and want to use heap to cache my data. I have enabled
it through the api setOnheapCacheEnabled provided in the CacheConfiguration.
Let's say I have a total RAM size of 12 GB. I have set both Xms and Xmx to 8
GB while starting the Ignite server. The reason I
Keep an eye on the voting threads named like this one "[VOTE] Apache Ignite
2.1.0 RC2”.
One the vote is passed and all the issues are resolved the release is to be
rolled out. In any case, an announcement will be sent to the @dev list as well.
—
Denis
> On Jul 19, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Muthu
Bob,
Original query is wrong for sure. \\\" means that you actually have a slash
in SQL string which is obviously wrong. As for the second error, it looks
like a misconfiguration. Please provide more information on what exactly you
did, your configuration, etc.
-Val
--
View this message in
Hello Everyone,
One of our cache access pattern is that it is accessed beyond an interval of
30 seconds (which is the default connection timeout). Every time it happens
the first call to the cache takes a long time to fetch the results.
I am planning to increase the idleConnectionTimeout to a
Thanks Vyacheslav!..i am looking forward to it.
Regards,
Muthu
-- The real danger with modern technology isn't that machines will begin to
think like people, but that people will begin to think like machines.
-- Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to
see what you
Hi Maureen,
Make sure that at cfg.setIndexedTypes(GeoCoordinate.class,
SurveyImage.class) you are specifying key-value pairs for each type you
want to register.
I mean it should be cfg.setIndexedTypes(SomeGeoCoordinateKey.class,
GeoCoordinate.class,
SomeSurveyImageKey.class, SurveyImage.class)
HI Mikhail,
Thanks for the response.
I am aware that the data center replication/HA is available in the paid
version of Ignite. At this point, I don't have the option to go for it.
What I am trying instead is to minimize my risk by distributing the data
between different clouds not necessarily
Hi Martin,
I've checked the same with 2.0 and it works on my side.
Which version of Ignite do you use?
Do you call it from Java, .NET or C++ ?
Please check that source files encoding is consistent. It's better to stick
with UTF-8.
Kind regards,
Alex.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Martin
Hi Ajay,
you question isn't fully correct,in both questions we should talk about
affinity key,
if you don't define affinity key, normal key is affinity key.
for simplicity I can say yes: all key/object pairs will be distributed
equally, at least for big amount of data with
good key's hashcode.
Hi,
Keys are distributed among partitions according to affinity function.
Partitions are distributed among nodes according to affinity function.
This chain "key->partition->node" is designed to simplify data exchange
between nodes on topology changing and due to performance reasons.
Hi Maureen,
Could you please share a reproduce for this as pom based project?
Thanks,
Mikhail.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-client-not-seeing-cache-created-by-server-tp15070p15130.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list
You can use visor command utility. It is available @
ignite_install/bin/ignite visor.sh and your configuration xml should be @
ignite_install/config folder.
On 19 Jul 2017 20:17, "Ajay [via Apache Ignite Users]" <
ml+s70518n15125...@n6.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we see the cache resides in
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/getting-started#ignite-visor-admin-console
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Ajay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we see the cache resides in ignite cluster with any console or tool
> etc.
> ?
>
> Thanks,
> Ajay.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in
Hi.
I just started with Ignite messaging and I encountered the following problem:
I have a simple Setup with 1 server and 1 client. Sending messages from the
client to the server works fine. But after a server restart I encounter the
problem that when I send a message with a custom class I get
Hi Amit,
it's expected penalty, ignite is cluster solution that requires fast and
reliable network.
Do you need share data between data centers for HA? if so, you can
implement
your own data center replication: install listener for cache changes, batch
data and send them
to remote data center,
Hi,
Can we see the cache resides in ignite cluster with any console or tool etc.
?
Thanks,
Ajay.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-Cache-Console-tp15125.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Arron,
you use internal classes that isn't part of public api, please read this
article:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/memory-and-cache-metrics
it explains how to get memory and cache metrics.
Thanks,
Mikhail.
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I want to know scenarios,
1)I have 10 affinity keys like 1-10 suppose when i load this keys between
two servers(2 nodes) it will equally distribute or randomly distribute?
2)I have 10 normal keys like 1-10 suppose when i load this keys between two
servers(2 nodes) it will equally distribute
got thanks!!!
aa...@tophold.com
From: ezhuravlev
Date: 2017-07-19 21:21
To: user
Subject: Re: How does node vistor task can work?
You don't need to use Visor tasks to get statistics.
Try this:
ignite.cluster().metrics()
or
ignite.cluster().node(node).metrics()
Evgeniii
--
View
You don't need to use Visor tasks to get statistics.
Try this:
ignite.cluster().metrics()
or
ignite.cluster().node(node).metrics()
Evgeniii
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/How-does-node-vistor-task-can-work-tp15095p15121.html
Sent from the
hi All,
Will Ignite support Embed SUM DML Like this SQL updates:
UPDATE A a
SET a.total=(
SELECT SUM(b.cnt)
FROM B b
WHERE b.id = a.id
)
Always throw a fail to parse SQL query exception .
aa...@tophold.com
Yeah, it's clear now.
You can use query syntax from Apache Lucene:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/2_9_4/queryparsersyntax.html
Name of the field, in this case, should be in uppercase.
For example: "A:query"
Evgenii
2017-07-19 12:01 GMT+03:00 iostream :
> I know how to
Hi,
You need either adjust entity/table name to the upper case like *select ID
from "personCache".PERSON p limit 5* or
add a config option , in this
case you will be able to perform the query
in the following way *select \"id\" from \"personCache\".\"Person\" p limit
5* (note the escaping is
Hi,
Now i can see the cache and see the objects created in it using
cache.iterator().
I would like to use a query to search the cache, so i have set indexed types
on the cache configuration.
Server configuration:
public void initCache() {
Ignite ignite =
Hi Varunkumar,
Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can
receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty
email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in
the reply.
Could you please try to reproduce the issue on
thank afedotov.
personCache definition in this xml file.
I know how to use @QueryTextField (as can be seen in my example).
When I perform a TextQuery it scans on all fields that I have used the
annotation on. I want the TextQuery to run only on one field and not on all
fields in my cache object.
Is my question clear?
--
View this message in
Hi,
As it said in JavaDoc, you can use @QueryTextField as annotation on fields
Evgenii
2017-07-19 11:46 GMT+03:00 iostream :
> Hi,
>
> Instead of performing a text query on the entire cache object as mentioned
> here
Hi,
Instead of performing a text query on the entire cache object as mentioned
here (https://apacheignite.readme.io/v2.0/docs/cache-queries#text-queries),
can I perform a text query on a single attribute in my cache value object?
Example -
public class my_object {
@QuerySqlField(index =
Could you please share your cache config or the full Ignite config, which
is better.
Kind regards,
Alex
19 июля 2017 г. 11:03 AM пользователь "howfree [via Apache Ignite Users]" <
ml+s70518n15109...@n6.nabble.com> написал:
> Yes.
> It came up with the error: Schema "PERSONCACHE" not found.
> I
Yes.
It came up with the error: Schema "PERSONCACHE" not found.
I guess it means the schema in H2 database.
but this cache should be different from it.
right?
--
View this message in context:
Hi,Mikhail
I am the first time to mail-list,thanks for your suggestion.
I had upload demo project, it is seem the problem is cache after
update,requery cache with return the old value, not the update dirty data.
IgniteDemoV2-log4j.zip
Have you tried without any quotation?
Kind regards,
Alex
19 июля 2017 г. 9:16 AM пользователь "howfree [via Apache Ignite Users]" <
ml+s70518n15102...@n6.nabble.com> написал:
The following error came up: Schema "PERSONCACHE" not found. The style
\"personCache\" can be separated from the Schema
As far as I know, It will be shortly after the end of the vote. [1]
Of course only in case of vote success.
Vote started yesterday, and must finish tomorrow.
Let's hope to see the new release by the end of this week.
[1]
Folks,
Any one knows when 2.1 would be coming out?
As per this, the release date is July 17th...this past Monday,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.1
Regards,
Muthu
-- The real danger with modern technology isn't that machines will begin to
think like people,
The following error came up:Schema "PERSONCACHE" not found.The style
\"personCache\" can be separated from the Schema "personCache" in H2.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/SQL-Syntax-error-in-cross-cache-query-tp15097p15102.html
Sent from the
Hi,
Looks like you have wrong schema name. Please adjust \\\"personCache\\\" to
\"personCache\".
Kind regards,
Alex
19 июля 2017 г. 8:25 AM пользователь "howfree [via Apache Ignite Users]" <
ml+s70518n15097...@n6.nabble.com> написал:
In ignite 2.0:
when I ran those codes:
SqlFieldsQuery sql =
50 matches
Mail list logo