Thanks Ilya. I tried all your suggestions and they work as expected. I'll
close the bug.
WRT cache groups, what's the rule of thumb with using cache groups? I read
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/cache-groups, but I'm not sure on the
approach I should take. Should I simply stay away from
Hi,
I tried your suggestion of using a NodeFilter but, is not solving this
issue. Using a NodeFilter by consistent-id in order to create the cache in
only one node is creating persistence information in every node:
In the node for which the filter is true (directory size 75MB):
Thank you, Denis. I'll research this topic further.
Any recommendation for/against using jetty as an embedded servlet
container, in this case, say, deployed as an ignite service?
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:22 PM Denis Magda wrote:
> Clay,
>
> Just start your Jetty server and deploy as many
Hello!
Please try doing cursor.close() before return;
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 09:17, adipro :
> Can someone please help regarding this issue?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>
Hello!
Have you tried the following example:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/platforms/python/examples/read_binary.py
(yes, it mostly works with tables, but tables and POJOs are mapped in the
same fashion).
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 18:54, Andrew
I'm having the same issues as these guys:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ignite-user/201901.mbox/%3csn6pr14mb2240feb74bc77de79b54ca67ca...@sn6pr14mb2240.namprd14.prod.outlook.com%3E
I would like to put POJOs in a map and get them using pyignite. Python
gives me ParseError('Binary
As Ilya suggested start with 2GB per server node. Then do the load testing
of your cluster using basic operations you suppose to have in prod. The
testing will show if you need to increase or decrease the heap size and to
which degree.
-
Denis
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 3:50 AM Ilya Kasnacheev
Hi Deepthi,
If RP4VM is comparable to VMWare VMotion then the following page should be
exactly what you are looking for:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/vmware-deployment#cluster-nodes-migration-with-vmotion
-
Denis
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:17 AM DEEPTHI KOLLIPARA
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
this issue is solved. I was using 2.4.4 cluster and using 2.3 binaries
Hello!
Yes, QueryEntity allows you to specify key fields / key field name. Then
you can create index over these fields.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 18:08, dilaz03 :
> Hi, Ilya.
>
> Thank you for reply. My table is defined by QueryEntity and doesn't have
> any
> explicit
Are you going to provide CVE-2020-1964 patches and patch instructions for
previous Ignite versions?
Regards,
-Nick
From: Sriveena Mattaparthi
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 9:04 AM
To: user@ignite.apache.org; dev ; annou...@apache.org;
Apache Security Team
Subject: COMMERCIAL:RE:
Hi, Ilya.
Thank you for reply. My table is defined by QueryEntity and doesn't have any
explicit primary keys. So alias '_key' points to cache key. I can define
some field with value from cache key, but it's duplication. May be I don't
know something about cache keys. Can I define cache key from
Hello!
This is expected :)
I recommend decreasing the number of caches, grouping them into
cacheGroup's so that they share metadata, or decreasing number of
partitions in their affinity functions.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 03:19, scottmf :
> hi Ilya, I have reproduced
Hello!
This is HTTP connection. Ignite does not use HTTP between servers and
clients (thin and thick). The only relevant place where HTTP is used with
Ignite is REST API.
Can you show the method in the trace?
at com.zetcode.restex.JerseyClient2.main (JerseyClient2.java:25)
Regards,
--
Thanks, Could you please confirm when the analysis will be updated here for the
CVE logged.
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1963
Regards,
Sriveena
From: Юрий
Sent: 03 June 2020 16:02
To: dev ; user@ignite.apache.org; annou...@apache.org;
Apache Security Team ; Sriveena Mattaparthi
Hello!
How is your table defined? _key is just an implicit alias for all of your
primary key columns. So you should be listing those.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 13:14, Dmitry Lazurkin :
> Hello,
>
> I try to define compound index with some field and _key:
> create index
Also,
In SQL query, we are having a semaphore lock where all the threads stay
there and only one thread can execute the code. It's because in the code, we
have jdbc connection query. And it's not thread safe. Sometimes we even get
thread hanging here if we keep increasing client worker threads.
Thanks for reply.
Our clients are connected in both ways one is JCache way and other is SQL
way each for various caches.
-> For get/put we use normal getAll() and normal putAll(). The thing is here
all the threads will have their own data and the data is not shared. So no
need to worry about
If I have a cache named "XYZ" with replication mode ON then what happens for
the queries if the topology configuration is as below.
1) Two app servers (clients) which make total 100 connections (50 each) in
parallel as it's multi-threaded application. Both are 64 core machines.
2) Two DB servers
Hello!
I think it involves the following tradeoff:
If you limit it, operations will wait on communication once the limit is
hit.
If you don't limit it, you will see OOM (heap memory) eventually.
This assumes that communication ever becomes a bottleneck, which will
almost never happen.
Since it
Hello!
I'm not completely sure, it surely depends on your use case (such as SQL,
which will hold result sets on heap).
2G of heap is usually enough for a server node.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 04:44, kay :
> Hello, I have 4 nodes for server node and I'd like to
Hi All,
Apache Ignite 2.8.1 has been released. The release contain fix of critical
vulnerability
CVE-2020-1963: Apache Ignite access to file system through predefined H2
SQL functions
Severity: Critical
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
All versions of Apache Ignite up
Can someone please help regarding this issue?
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Can someone please help regarding this issue?
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Can someone please help regarding this issue?
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
When I removed the stopped Server node IP from Client IP list and server IP
list and start both clients, it is working fine.
Although I couldn't reproduce it again. If I found it again, I'll try taking
dumps and reply it in this thread.
Java version -> jdk 1.8.0_152
Ignite version -> 8.7.10
Hello,
I try to define compound index with some field and _key:
create index idx_desc on mytable (somecolumn asc, _key desc);
create index idx_asc on mytable (somecolumn asc, _key asc);
Error: Column doesn't exist: _KEY (state=42000,code=3008)
Is this bug? Because I see _key column in sqlline
Hi ,
We are using 2.8.0 version. And I still get this warning. Can you please
explain the significance of this property and what is the advisable value to
keep in production. I saw someone keep it to 1024. What is the significance
and what happens after 1024.
Thanks,
Prudhvi
--
Sent from:
I am seeing this problem even on Ignite 2.8.1, spark 2.4.4
Does spark-worker and ignite be on the same server?
val CONFIG = "resources/node-config-spark.xml"
val TABLE_NAME = "table_access_master"
//Creating Ignite-specific implementation of Spark session.
val igniteSession =
How are your clients connected? Are they thick or thin clients? And what are
the queries? Are they JCache (i.e., get/put) or SQL?
> On 3 Jun 2020, at 08:54, adipro wrote:
>
> If I have a cache named "XYZ" with replication mode ON then what happens for
> the queries if the topology
Hi Team,
We have implemented Apache Ignite 2.7 version with Ignite native persistence
enabled in partition mode. We are planning to create a DR(Disaster Recovery)
site for the production environment using RP4VM.
RP4VM will technically keep the cloned VM at DR Site in sync with the
Thank you so much!
It is very helpful!! :)
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hi,
I am running a program that connects to a remote spark cluster. I get the
following error. Any insight into the error?
Spark 2.4.4
Scala 2.11.12
Ignite 2.8.1
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
33 matches
Mail list logo