Thanks Ilya.
No. Did not take a thread dump. Will do so if I observe this behaviour next
time.
Also how do I add monitoring for such nodes ?
regards,
eena.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hi Team,
Our application is migrating 2.6 version to 2.8 version
While upgrading, getting below error.
Java. lang. IiilegalaccessError: tried to access field
org.H2.utill.LocalDateTimeUtills.LOCAL_DATE
It seams problem with h2 Database.
We are using 1.4.196
Could you please let me know support
I just checked the ignite doc for atomic configuration.
But it doesn't say that it is applicable to distributed data structures.
Is it really applicable to distributed data structures like count down latch
On Tue 9 Jun, 2020, 7:26 AM Prasad Bhalerao Hi,
> I was under the impression that countdow
Hi Guru,
I am integrating the Spring into the Ignite, when deploying service, with
metho deployNodeSingleton, met no bean found exception, show as below, which
lead the Suppressed: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Error
occured during service initialization:
[locId=13760585-1342-47
Hello!
I start up
sh ./ignite.sh -J-DgridName=testGridName -v ./config/config-cache.xml
and in config-cache.xml
but server start failed.
Is that not proper to set igniteInstanceName??
log is here
class org.apache.ignite.IgniteException: Failed to start manager:
GridManagerAdapter [enable
Ignite Visor starts daemon node inside to connect to the cluster, it
doesn't matter cluster was started. All you need is to configure addresses
of the cluster nodes in the config file, the same way as you do fo other
nodes in the cluster.
Evgenii
пн, 8 июн. 2020 г. в 19:01, Prasad Bhalerao :
> H
Hi,
I am starting ignite inside my java spring boot app. I do not use ignite
shell script to start it.
Can I use ignite visor in such case to connect to my ignite cluster?
What all the minimum required scrips do I need to use ignite visor?
Thanks,
Prasad
Hi,
I was under the impression that countdown latch is implemented in
replicated cache. So when any number of nodes go down it does not loose
it's state.
Can you please explain why atmoc data structures are using 1 back when its
state is very important?
Can we enforce atomic data structures to u
How can you update those k,v classes? Do you have to take the cluster down
or can you do a rolling upgrade somehow?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:37 AM Ilya Kasnacheev
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> If these classes are used as key or value types, then yes. Key/value types
> are not peer loaded. Otherwise, you
Is there any way to pass the cluster address to ignitevisorcmd.sh on the
command line or must it be set in the config.xml file used?
Limit your env to two nodes.
Try using --net=host for docker containers. If that works, limiting to use
setLocalHost for TcpCommunicationSPI, and configure ZooKeeper to use address
translation/or bind to a specific address.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
You can use setlocalHost to bind a node to one address only.
see:
https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/configuration/IgniteConfiguration.html#setLocalHost-java.lang.String-
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hi,
Have you tried to reproduce this behaviour with the latest release - 2.8.1?
If I remember correctly, there were some fixes regarding the partition
counters mismatches, for sample:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10078
-
Alex Shapkin
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.
Hi,
Yes, seems like the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1410 is not
resolved, unfortunately.
Is it possible to listen for predefined events like
LifecycleEventType.AFTER_NODE_START or EVT_CLUSTER_ACTIVATED?
Alternatively, you might want to utilize Ignite data structures, like
Atomic
Hello!
It's not clear, whether the code snippet came from a client or a server. If
it's a client, then I'd recommend you try sending the keys and additional
data directly to a server node and perform the insertion directly on the
node. The Compute API could be an option here [1]
You might also wa
I think the problem might also, be the client is running inside DC/OS with
docker containers. When I check the network topology all
connected aplication are reporting multiple addresses...
Here is an example of a single client... Is it possible to tell it only
bind to one or only use one?
It is. It seems to only happen when I scale the client. Just curious. is it
possible that the client is bound to alot of address and
causing communication issues???
When I look at the topology through ignite visor I see the client has
multiple possible addresses. Is it possible to tell the client t
I just wanted to highlight that there is the Partition Awareness feature
available for thin clients.
When enabled, a client will know to witch node a partition belongs and send
a request directly to that node.
[1] -
https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/thin-client#partition-awareness
[2] -
http
Hello,
It means that a node was not able to exchange message w/another node
because of network or firewall issues. It lists the node in question inside
the message.
Check to make sure that the node is available and is in working order.
*Failed to send DHT near response *[futId=16392, nearF
In terms of TcpCommunicationSPI it might help:
https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/spi/communication/tcp/TcpCommunicationSpi.html#setLocalAddress-java.lang.String-
Also look into setting the localaddress:
https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache
Would address resolver work here with Zookeeper discovery? I think most of
my communications erros are due to my clients binding to multiple addresses?
Hi, I got the below errors on my client node. CLIENT=TRUE
I can see that it cannot communicate but why is it trying to communicate to
127.0.0.1? This is running inside a docker container and the cache nodes
are running on dedicated VMs.
{"appTimestamp":"2020-06-08T19:26:46.209+00:00","threadName"
Clay,
This 3-years old blogging series talks about a recommended architecture for
deployments with Ignite service grid:
- Part 1:
https://dzone.com/articles/running-microservices-on-top-of-in-memory-data-gri
- Part 2:
https://dzone.com/articles/running-microservices-on-top-of-in-memo
Clay,
I assume embedding jetty as an ignite service, i.e., as an ignite server
> node, is not desirable (still don't know the reason).
Let's suppose that your cluster has 3 server/data nodes with application
records distributed evenly - so that each node keeps ~33% of the whole data
set. Next, i
Hi,
By default, cache, that stores all atomic structures has only 1 backup, so,
after losing all data for this certain latch, it recreates it. To change
the default atomic configuration use
IgniteConfiguration.setAtomicConfiguration.
Evgenii
сб, 6 июн. 2020 г. в 06:20, Akash Shinde :
> *Issue:*
Hello Ilya!,
Thanks for your response. I've created a new project and seems that now It
works correctly, I must have a problem. But I have another doubt with
REPLICATED cache. I think that all nodes must have same data in this mode,
Is It true?, with online tool of Apache Ignite I make a query to
Hello!
It was disabled not just because of potential data loss but because the
cache was resurrected on such start and could break cluster.
Creating cache per operation and destroying afterwards is an anti-pattern,
it can cause all sorts of issues and is better avoided.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnach
Hello!
${sys:} can use any system property which exists in the JVM.
If you put your gridName (or consistentId) into system property, you can
refer to it from both Ignite configuration (xml or otherwise) and log4j2
configuration.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пн, 8 июн. 2020 г. в 04:55, kay :
>
Hello!
Metrics were sent when node was already segmented by cluster, hence
"unknown".
Why it did not reconnect, I do not know. Did you collect a thread dump of
this client node by chance?
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пн, 8 июн. 2020 г. в 09:53, VeenaMithare :
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday we had so
Hello!
Do you have a reproducer SQL script to observe that?
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пн, 8 июн. 2020 г. в 10:46, manueltg89 :
> I have three tables in Apache Ignite, each table has a affinity key to
> other
> table, when I make a join between tables with direct relations this works
> perfe
Hello!
I have met an error like this one, and my recommendation is that on all
nodes, client and server, you should set file.encoding to the same value
(UTF-8 usually, however CJK multi-byte encodings should also work).
Make sure all of your JVMs are launched with -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8.
ignite.sh
Hello!
This sounds like a good application point of *enforceJoinOrder=true*.
Consider:
3: jdbc:ignite:thin://localhost> !connect
jdbc:ignite:thin://localhost?enforceJoinOrder=true
4: jdbc:ignite:thin://localhost>
4: jdbc:ignite:thin://localhost> EXPLAIN SELECT f.Date_key,
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hello!
Why do you open connection inside the semaphore? You are supposed to open
connection(s) in advance, only issue updates inside the semaphore.
The whole approach is questionable (no sense to use thin JDBC if you
already have Ignite node) but this one is a killer. You also seem to open a
new
Hello!
If these classes are used as key or value types, then yes. Key/value types
are not peer loaded. Otherwise, you just need to enable peer class loading.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пн, 8 июн. 2020 г. в 05:05, Andrew Munn :
> Is there ever any reason for the classes of Objects being put i
Hi, I have created jira for this issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13132
Thanks,
Akash
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 9:29 AM Akash Shinde wrote:
> Can someone please help me with this issue.
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 6:45 PM Akash Shinde wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Issue: Countdown latched g
Dear Igniters,
Many of you heard about starting development of new SQL engine based on
Calcite. Currently we are only in beginning of the way and it will require
many works to achieve the goal. In order to understand where are we and
which features already done and which of them could be started b
I have three tables in Apache Ignite, each table has a affinity key to other
table, when I make a join between tables with direct relations this works
perfectly, but if I make a non distributed join between three tables this
return empty, is normal this behaviour?, Could I make in another way?
tbl
37 matches
Mail list logo