Re: Nodes failed to join the cluster after restarting

otherwise >> we would find the solution rather quickly. Needless to say, I can't >> reproduce it. Error message that you see was created for the case when you >> join your node to the wrong cluster. >> >> Do you have any custom code during the node start? And one more qu

Re: Nodes failed to join the cluster after restarting

cluster didn't > have those values at all. > The rule is that activated cluster can't accept changed properties from > joining node. So, the workaround would be deactivating the cluster, joining > the node and activating it again. But as I said, I don't think that you'll > see this

Re: Nodes failed to join the cluster after restarting

ce.DistributedMetaStorageImpl#ver", > it's incremented on every distributed metastorage setting update. You can > find your error message in the same class. > > Please follow up with more questions and logs it possible, I hope we'll > figure it out. > > Thank you! > > пт

Nodes failed to join the cluster after restarting

Hi, I have a 3-node cluster with persistence enabled. All the three nodes are in the baseline topology. The ignite version is 2.8.1. When I restart the first node, it encounters an error and fails to join the cluster. The error message is "Caused by: org.apache. ignite.spi.IgniteSpiException:

Re: Ignite test takes several days

cga.gridgain.com/ > > Obviously, you need to create account in Apache Ignite CI. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > чт, 27 авг. 2020 г. в 16:33, Cong Guo : > >> Hi, >> >> I try to build the ignite-core on my workstation. I use the original >> i

Re: Ignite test takes several days

y using -Dmaven.*test*.*skip*=true flag. > > Evgenii > > чт, 27 авг. 2020 г. в 06:33, Cong Guo : > >> Hi, >> >> I try to build the ignite-core on my workstation. I use the original >> ignite-2.8.1 source package. The test, specifically >> GridCach

Ignite test takes several days

Hi, I try to build the ignite-core on my workstation. I use the original ignite-2.8.1 source package. The test, specifically GridCacheWriteBehindStoreLoadTest, has been running for several days. Is it normal? I run "mvn clean package" directly. Should I configure anything in advance? Thank you.

Re: Are data in NearCache BinaryObject?

er for your use case? > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > ср, 11 дек. 2019 г. в 22:54, Cong Guo : > >> Hi, >> >> Are the entries stored in local NearCache on my client node in the format >> of deserialized java objects or BinaryObject? Will the

Are data in NearCache BinaryObject?

Hi, Are the entries stored in local NearCache on my client node in the format of deserialized java objects or BinaryObject? Will the entry in local on-heap NearCache be deserialized from BinaryObject when I call the get function? Thanks, Nap

RE: UnsupportedOperationException when updating a field in binary object

Thank you for the reply. You are right. The function used to initially get the set returns an unmodifiableSet. That is the reason for the error. However, when we use a Map as a field and initially write an unmodifiableMap, we can still modify the Map using getField. The code is like how we use

UnsupportedOperationException when updating a field in binary object

Hi, I use a Set class as a field. When I update the field via the BinaryObjectBuilder, I get an UnsupportedOperationException. I use QueryEntity to set the field like: fieldNameTypeMap.put(tags_FieldStr, Set.class.getName()); Then my update function (in my EntryProcessor) is like:

latency for replication

Hi, How can I measure the latency for updates to be replicated from the primary node to a backup node? I use the PRIMARY_SYNC mode. I want to know the time for a backup node to catch up. Is there any API for the latency measurement? Do you have any suggestion? Thanks, Cong

RE: How to set JVM opts in the configuration xml

Hi, Please ignore this email. I lost common sense. Sorry. From: Cong Guo Sent: 2018年7月6日 15:25 To: user@ignite.apache.org Subject: How to set JVM opts in the configuration xml Hi, I start the Ignite node in my own code instead of using ignite.sh. How do I set JVM opts in the configuration xml

How to set JVM opts in the configuration xml

Hi, I start the Ignite node in my own code instead of using ignite.sh. How do I set JVM opts in the configuration xml? Thanks, Cong

What is the difference between PRIMARY_SYNC and FULL_ASYNC

Hi, Does PRIMARY_SYNC means waiting for only primary copies even if the primary copies are on remote nodes, while FULL_ASYNC means waiting for only local copies no matter the local copies are primary or not? Could you please give me an example case to show different performance results with

RE: SQL cannot find data of new class definition

Hi, I don't think this feature requires any change in the SQL API. When we create a cache, even if the value object contains a nested object, the fields in the nested object can be mapped to columns in the table. Now we can do this using QueryEntity, for example, QueryEntity personEntity =

RE: A bug in SQL "CREATE TABLE" and its underlying Ignite cache

So can I add a field to a nested object dynamically (without restarting the cluster) by using annotations? -Original Message- From: slava.koptilin [mailto:slava.kopti...@gmail.com] Sent: 2018年6月21日 10:44 To: user@ignite.apache.org Subject: RE: A bug in SQL "CREATE TABLE" and its

RE: A bug in SQL "CREATE TABLE" and its underlying Ignite cache

ARY KEY(firstName))" + "WITH \"BACKUPS=1, ATOMICITY=TRANSACTIONAL, WRITE_SYNCHRONIZATION_MODE=PRIMARY_SYNC, CACHE_NAME=" + PERSON_CACHE_NAME + "\""; Thanks! вт, 19 июн. 2018 г. в 16:43, Cong Guo mailto:cong.g...@huawei.com>>: Hi, How should I

RE: A bug in SQL "CREATE TABLE" and its underlying Ignite cache

UPS=1, ATOMICITY=TRANSACTIONAL, WRITE_SYNCHRONIZATION_MODE=PRIMARY_SYNC, CACHE_NAME=" + PERSON_CACHE_NAME + ", VALUE_TYPE=" + Person.class.getName() + "\""; Best regards, Slava. пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 21:50, Cong Guo mailto:cong.g...@huawei.com>>: Hi

RE: SQL cannot find data of new class definition

hrough QueryEntity. Please take a look at this page: https://apacheignite.readme.io/v2.5/docs/indexes#queryentity-based-configuration I would suggest specifying a new field via QueryEntity in XML configuration file and restart your cluster. I hope it helps. Thanks! пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 16:47, Co

A bug in SQL "CREATE TABLE" and its underlying Ignite cache

Hi, I need to use both SQL and non-SQL APIs (key-value) on a single cache. I follow the document in: https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/create-table I use "CREATE TABLE" to create the table and its underlying cache. I can use both SQL "INSERT" and put to add data to the cache. However,

RE: SQL cannot find data of new class definition

Hi, Does anyone have experience using both Cache and SQL interfaces at the same time? How do you solve the possible upgrade? Is my problem a bug for BinaryObject? Should I debug the ignite source code? From: Cong Guo Sent: 2018年6月15日 10:12 To: 'user@ignite.apache.org' Subject: RE: SQL cannot

RE: SQL cannot find data of new class definition

I run the SQL query only after the cache size has changed. The new data should be already in the cache when I run the query. From: Cong Guo Sent: 2018年6月15日 10:01 To: user@ignite.apache.org Subject: RE: SQL cannot find data of new class definition Hi, Thank you for the reply. In my original

RE: SQL cannot find data of new class definition

e case, where the layout of dat1a is expected to change, is to just use SQL (DDL) defined tables and forget about BinaryObject's. With regards to your original case, i.e., a different class definition: I could spend time debugging it if you had more info, but this approach is not recommended anyway

SQL cannot find data of new class definition

Hi all, I am trying to use BinaryObject to support data of different class definitions in one cache. This is for my system upgrade. I first start a cache with data, and then launch a new node to join the cluster and put new data into the existing cache. The new data has a different class

RE: ClassCastException When Using CacheEntryProcessor in StreamVisitor

object and then put it back? Thanks, Cong From: Cong Guo Sent: 2018年6月6日 9:50 To: user@ignite.apache.org Subject: RE: ClassCastException When Using CacheEntryProcessor in StreamVisitor Hi, I put the same jar on the two nodes. The codes are the same. Why does lambda not work here? Thank you. From

RE: ClassCastException When Using CacheEntryProcessor in StreamVisitor

Hi, Is it possible you change lambdas code between calls? Or may be classes are differs on nodes? Try to replace lambdas with static classes in your code. Will it work for you? On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Cong Guo mailto:cong.g...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi, The stacktrace is as follows

RE: ClassCastException When Using CacheEntryProcessor in StreamVisitor

When Using CacheEntryProcessor in StreamVisitor Hello, Can you please share the full stacktrace so we can see where the original ClassCastException is initiated? If it is not printed on a client, it should be printed on one of the server nodes. Thanks! вт, 5 июн. 2018 г. в 18:35, Cong Guo

RE: ClassCastException When Using CacheEntryProcessor in StreamVisitor

Hello, Can anyone see this email? From: Cong Guo Sent: 2018年6月1日 13:11 To: 'user@ignite.apache.org' Subject: ClassCastException When Using CacheEntryProcessor in StreamVisitor Hi, I want to use IgniteDataStreamer to handle data updates. Is it possible to use CacheEntryProcessor

ClassCastException When Using CacheEntryProcessor in StreamVisitor

Hi, I want to use IgniteDataStreamer to handle data updates. Is it possible to use CacheEntryProcessor in StreamVisitor? I write a simple program as follows. It works on a single node, but gets a ClassCastException on two nodes. The two nodes are on two physical machines. I have set