/doc
../../doc
true
jvm 1| 2016-03-16 08:08:39,183 | WARN | tp1085327538-940 | Response
| 217 - org.eclipse.jet
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Achim Nierbeck
wrote:
>
> http://ops4j.github.io/pax/web/4.2.x/index.html#_advanced_jetty_configuration
For my particular application, zero java code is actually preferable.
Anyhow, why would configuring it that way prevent Jetty from try to write
to closed conn
This is only a problem for errors.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> /doc
>
>class="org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ResourceHandler">
> ../../doc
> true
>
ahh it's a closed connection ... which version of Pax-Web are you using?
And did you check if that bug is already been fixed with Pax-Web?
regards, Achim
2016-03-18 11:54 GMT+01:00 Benson Margulies :
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Achim Nierbeck
> wrote:
>
>>
>> http://ops4j.github.io/pa
Karaf 4.0.4 brought me 4.2.4 of pax-web.
Is it safe to stick 4.2.5 in there?
I'm making assumptions about the meaning of the following, but, in general,
it seems wrong to get this much traffic for a simple 404 on static content.
jvm 1| 2016-03-16 08:08:39,183 | WARN | tp1085327538-940 | Re
Hi,
maybe the service approach suits you better?
http://ops4j.github.io/pax/web/4.2.x/index.html#_advanced_jetty_configuration
go to section Using Handler and Connectors as Services
regards, Achim
2016-03-16 13:26 GMT+01:00 Benson Margulies :
> This is only a problem for errors.
>
>
> On Wed,
