Awesome, thanks! Just what I was looking for.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Rick Bullotta <
rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com> wrote:
> Take a look at the timeline functionality in the index package in the wiki.
> It uses neo, not lucene, to store the "index".
>
> --Original Message-
Im sorry but I think your attachment got caught in our mail filters.
Could you perhaps send me your project (including the entire data file
via some file sending service, f.ex http://sprend.com) and send it to
me directly, matt...@neotechnology.com?
2010/1/28, Symeon (Akis) Papadopoulos :
>
Take a look at the timeline functionality in the index package in the wiki. It
uses neo, not lucene, to store the "index".
--Original Message--
From: Nathan Marz
Sender: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
ReplyTo: Neo user discussions
Subject: [Neo] Range Query using
I have nodes that have a "timestamp" property and I want to do range queries
on timestamp, such as to get all nodes older than X days. Looking at
LuceneIndexService, the methods seem to only provide for key-value lookups.
Is there any way to do range queries or some alternative way to do this?
Tha
Great, lucene handles merging in the background automatically if the
files are too sharded. So this error shouldn't occur unless there are
some corner case where some IndexReader/IndexWriter isn't closed
properly... so that's why I'm suspecting a bug here :)
Great that you found a work-arou
Not at all, you're not the first one to overlook that inheritance!
2010/1/28, Anton Popov :
> Thanks for a quick answer, Mattias.
>
> Sorry for a stupid questions, just haven't noticed the inheritance of
> Relationship interface.
>
> On 28 January 2010 19:43, Mattias Persson wrote:
>
>> Relations
Thanks for a quick answer, Mattias.
Sorry for a stupid questions, just haven't noticed the inheritance of
Relationship interface.
On 28 January 2010 19:43, Mattias Persson wrote:
> Relationship has all the property methods, just like Node... they're
> actually on PropertyContainer (a common sup
Relationship has all the property methods, just like Node... they're
actually on PropertyContainer (a common super interface to Node and
Relationship) see
http://api.neo4j.org/current/org/neo4j/graphdb/Relationship.html and
http://api.neo4j.org/current/org/neo4j/graphdb/PropertyContainer.html
for m
Hello everyone,
Is there any possibility to assign properties to Relations?
The matter is I want to try Dijkstra algorithm performance on some weighted
directed graph and don't know where to put weight actually...
--
Best regards,
Popov Anton
___
Neo m
I'd vote for using the begin/finish terms for transactions, just as in
neo4j. That'd make you feel more cosy and at home perhaps?
2010/1/28 Tobias Ivarsson :
> I personally prefer to handle (at least write-) transactions manually. But
> in this case I think the best option is to go with whatever i
Well, you could just as well download the latest jar file from the
maven repository... if you're only after the jar file, that is.
Got to http://m2.neo4j.org/org/neo4j/neo4j-rdf/0.6-SNAPSHOT/ and grapb
the latest there. Or include that dependency in your maven pom.
The "Apoc" release only include
Hi Avishay,
neo-weaver is not being actively maintained at the moment. But there are
other projects that do (roughly) the same thing, and are very much alive,
such as jo4neo [http://code.google.com/p/jo4neo/]. I for one, think that
it's much more interesting to see these tools grow "in the wild" w
I personally prefer to handle (at least write-) transactions manually. But
in this case I think the best option is to go with whatever is most natural
in gremlin.
I think this is yet another case where it would be nice if Neo4j allowed
read operations without a transactional context. Then manual t
Francis,
we have not released the surrounding components that are not contained
in the APOC as compliant snapshots. That means, you should check out
trunk from svn for the interesting components with e.g.
svn co https://svn.neo4j.org/components/neo-rdf/trunk/ neo-rdf
mvn install
And then use that
14 matches
Mail list logo
