Hi,
I'm conducting experiments with two databases and have noticed a
radical performance drop when dealing with large databases.
I am working with dense triadic datasets, consisting of three node
types: A,B,C and hyperedges Y.
Basically one hyperedge y := (a,b,c) is stored in the db as 3 neo4j
rel
Hi Peter,
thank you very much for your quick reply, unfortunately there is no
messages.log, seems I have an older db version.
I'm sending you the ls dump from the directory:
total 5318580
11 active_tx_log
4096 lucene
4096 lucene-fulltext
27 neostore
9 neostore.id
34954011 neostore.nodestore
Hi,
there is still no difference in the performance, which is somewhat disturbing.
I cant't see the allocation of nioneo memory mapping in the java
process at all. It goes up to the heap size and then stops there.
Marius
2010/12/7 Marius Kubatz :
> Hi Peter,
>
> thank you very
Hello guys, hello community!
I'm currently evaluating neo4j for my thesis and have a wish :)
I have already opened a ticket for this,(
https://trac.neo4j.org/ticket/241 ) but
I would like to hear what you guys think about it.
Basically it just involves the ability to index Neo4j Relationships wit
tire database with
> particular float values, then a separate index would be better.
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Marius Kubatz >wrote:
>
> > Hello guys, hello community!
> >
> > I'm currently evaluating neo4j for my thesis and have a wish :)
> >
Hi,
I have a question regarding traverser, is there a way how I can optimize my
code to use it?
Problem is: my use case is a dense graph with a lot of relationships...
So most of the time I have one node with thousands of relationships
attached.
I have tested my code on the following Graph:
1 roo
Hi!
I have a very stupid question...
Is it ensured that a relationship between two Nodes stays a singleton, even
if another relationship of the same type and direction is added between
those Nodes?
Sometimes I get strange results when I delete nodes, that's why I ask.
Thanks in advance and best
7 matches
Mail list logo