dnagir wrote
>
> On 02/12/2011, at 11:28 PM, Rick Bullotta wrote:
>
> Doesn't matter how you play the words, you need transactions somewhere.
> And with REST it is only available as a database plugin.
> For most people it is just not worth the effort (especially who's not
> coming from Java back
Anyway, You are talking now about things that doesn't exist and I have to
implement them on my own.
I can't imagine RDBMS server that doesn't give me JDBC driver in the box.
Unfortunately Neo4j is like this. There is no native transaction-full
support so Neo4j can work as standalone server with ma
Michael Hunger wrote
>
>> Am I missing something?
>> I hope I do, because in this situation, Neo4j isn't actually interesting
>> DB
>> server/solution...but I want it to be.
>
> I would like to know some more detailed reasons for that, so far we
> haven't received this kind of response.
Do You
Michael Hunger wrote
>
> No, the alternative there is to provide a server-side extension that
> encapsulates your business logic as an endpoint running inside of a tx.
>
Yes, this is 3rd solution. But this is the worst one because I have to
create custom layer which will work ONLY with my app.
Hi
I have read as much I was able to read about Neo4j with the topic I wrote
below.
My imaginations of DB server (doesn't matter RDBMS or NoSQL) is that the
crucial things for DB server is interesting from development point of view
are (musts!):
1. DB server must be able to work as standalone ser
5 matches
Mail list logo
