Re: [Neo] Holding nodes between transactions

2008-09-25 Thread Michael Hunger
Thanks for the answers. The main question however remains. I don't know how this is with Software Transactional Memory. If you hold nodes between transactions and they are e.g. deleted by another thread/user then your reference is no longer valid. Changed properties/relationships shouldn't

Re: [Neo] Holding nodes between transactions

2008-09-25 Thread Emil Eifrem
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Michael Hunger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the answers. The main question however remains. I don't know how this is with Software Transactional Memory. If you hold nodes between transactions and they are e.g. deleted by another thread/user then your

[Neo] Holding nodes between transactions

2008-09-24 Thread Michael Hunger
When looking at imdb examples the nodes are hold as delegates of the domain objects. What is the implication of holding neo nodes from one transaction to another? And whats the best patterns related to that. The same question goes along regarding what are the best strategies of making start

Re: [Neo] Holding nodes between transactions

2008-09-24 Thread Emil Eifrem
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Michael Hunger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When looking at imdb examples the nodes are hold as delegates of the domain objects. What is the implication of holding neo nodes from one transaction to another? And whats the best patterns related to that. I think