Hi,
After some discussions following the input here we decided to go with
no explicit .api package but an explicit .impl package (for
implementation that is not supposed to be public). The 1.0 release
will then look like this:
o neo component renamed to kernel
- old core API
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Johan Svensson jo...@neotechnology.com wrote:
Hi,
After some discussions following the input here we decided to go with
no explicit .api package but an explicit .impl package (for
implementation that is not supposed to be public). The 1.0 release
will then
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Laurent Laborde kerdez...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Johan Svensson jo...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
Hi,
After some discussions following the input here we decided to go with
no explicit .api package but an explicit .impl package (for
Hi all!
For our upcoming final 1.0 release we are thinking about restructuring the
components and package names to make them at least closer to something we
would want to live with for a considerable future. The main affected
component at this point is the Neo4j kernel, even if other components
Ivarsson
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 3:28 PM
To: Neo user discussions
Subject: [Neo] RFC: Potentially breaking changes in the upcoming 1.0
release
Hi all!
For our upcoming final 1.0 release we are thinking about restructuring the
components and package names to make them at least closer
Hi there,
from an OSGi perspective, everything between bundles is handled on
package level. From that perspective, separation of api and impl (and
others) is better separated via org.neo4j.api and org.neo4j.impl etc.
Otherwise, e.g. the org.neo4j.* would be exported from the bundle
containing the
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Mattias Persson
matt...@neotechnology.comwrote:
2010/1/6 Rick Bullotta rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com:
It's a relatively minor thing to fix in our code. I would suggest
reconsidering the retro façade, however - it really doesn't buy you
much
and
Thanks Andreas for the input,
I guess if Stuart McCulloch is doing it in PaxConstruct, we can stop
arguing :) So, no problems from the OSGi side for root-package-APIs :)
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and Sales, Neo Technology
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46
8 matches
Mail list logo
