ivs to do so.
> Niels
>
>> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:24:44 +1200
>> From: bryc...@gmail.com
>> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Issues with IndexedRelationship
>>
>> I have made the changes in regards to SortedTree in regards to relationships
I like this idea
> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:41:52 +1200
> From: bryc...@gmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Issues with IndexedRelationship
>
> Another thought if there is going to be a larger refactor of the code is
> whether the indexing mechanism
the component, so if there are
> >> people
> >> using the software, they will accept that they are bleeding edgers.
> >> Indeed addNode should return the KEY_VALUE relationship and I think we
> >> should change the signature of SortedTree to turn it into
&
nature of SortedTree to turn it into
>> Iterable. No need to maintain a Node iterator, the node is
>> always one getEndNode away.
>> Niels
>>
>> > Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:17:59 +1200
>> > From: bryc...@gmail.com
>> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>>
+1200
> > From: bryc...@gmail.com
> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Issues with IndexedRelationship
> >
> > Will have to experiment with changing my id's to be stored as longs, it
> does
> > make perfect sense really that it woul
hould
change the signature of SortedTree to turn it into Iterable. No
need to maintain a Node iterator, the node is always one getEndNode away.
Niels
> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:17:59 +1200
> From: bryc...@gmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Issues with In
e indexed Node. Then
> IndexedRelationship.DirectRelationship can be created with that relationship
> as an argument. We get the Direction and the RelationshipType for free.
> Niels
>
> > Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:36:11 +1200
> > From: bryc...@gmail.com
> > To: use
ent, so I think you are one
> > of the first to actually try it out. Personally I have chosen to directly
> > work with SortedTree, because I am working within the framework of a wrapper
> > API, so I can integrate the functionality behind the regular
> > createRelationshipTo and
lationships methods.
> I don't think API changes will be an issue at the moment.
> Niels
> > Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:22:11 +1200
> > From: bryc...@gmail.com
> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> > Subject: [Neo4j] Issues with IndexedRelationship
> >
> > Hi,
&
22:11 +1200
> From: bryc...@gmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: [Neo4j] Issues with IndexedRelationship
>
> Hi,
>
> As I mentioned a while ago I am looking at using IndexedRelationship's
> within my application. The major thing that
Hi,
As I mentioned a while ago I am looking at using IndexedRelationship's
within my application. The major thing that was missing for me to be able
to do this was IndexedRelationshipExpander being able to provide all the
relationships from the leaf end of indexed relationships through the the
ro
11 matches
Mail list logo
