data, just increase the variable 'amountTypeA' at
line 26.
--
alican
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-performance-with-400million-nodes-tp3467806p3472966.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive
anders, thank you very much for reporting back and looking at it!
Good luck fixing the bug then
--
alican
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-performance-with-400million-nodes-tp3467806p3486237.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community
of the graph I used for
testing. If you need more data, just increase the variable 'amountTypeA' at
line 26.
--
alican
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-performance-with-400million-nodes-tp3467806p3472966.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community
the amount of
nodes to be displayed to 50.
I thought It would load data lazily?
Best regards
alican
Best,
David
Best regards
--
alican
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-performance-with-400million-nodes-tp3467806p3467806
Hi!
Also Neoclipse won't start/connect to the database anymore with these
amount
of data.
Am I missing some configurations for neoclipse?
Are you getting an error message?
No error messages. Is there an option to enable logging?
I let neoclipse run for almost an hour and suddenly the
Hi Alican,
But I am still a bit concerned about the 128GB RAM..
You can run it on less of course. You could run it on your laptop and it would
still work.
However Neo4j is clever in its use of RAM. The more RAM you can allocate to
Neo4j, the more chance that database reads can come straight
hey anders!
Thanks for the pointers.
Am 01.11.2011 09:49, schrieb Anders Nawroth:
Hi!
Also Neoclipse won't start/connect to the database anymore with these
amount
of data.
Am I missing some configurations for neoclipse?
Are you getting an error message?
No error messages. Is there an
hey jim! Thanks for the thoughts.
I know I could run it on less RAM, it's not a matter of can or cannot. I
am also aware that the more RAM the better the performance.
But my question is more: how will it perform with less RAM, say 32GB.
Every system is quite fast with this amount of RAM.
I am
Hi!
If you start Neoclipse from the command line you may see some extra
output there. Also, inside the Neoclipse directory there's a workspace
directory, and inside that you'll find .metadata/.log
There is no such directory (I am using neo4j 1.4.2) (I am aware that it
is supposed to be a
Alican,
we have other customers with that RAM sizes.
It is always about the size of your hot data-set (i.e. cached) the better you
understand your use-cases, the better you can estimate the # of nodes and rels
(and their properties) that have to be cached.
Michael
Am 01.11.2011 um 10:53
and
relations?
Also Neoclipse won't start/connect to the database anymore with these amount
of data.
Am I missing some configurations for neoclipse?
Best regards
--
alican
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-performance-with-400million
11 matches
Mail list logo