I have a few Part nodes related with each via HASPART
relationship/edges.
(eg Part1---HASPART---Part2---HASPART---Part3 etc) .
TraversalDescription works fine, following each Part's outgoing HASPART
relationship.
Then I add a large number (say 100.000) of Container Nodes, where each
Container has
That is rather a case of warming up your caches.
Determining the traversal speed from the first run is not a good benchmark as
it doesn't represent production usage :)
The same (warming up) is true for all kinds of benchmarks (except for startup
performance benchmarks).
Cheers
Michael
Am
[mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Hunger
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:25 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Slow Traversals on Nodes with too many Relationships
That is rather a case of warming up your caches.
Determining the traversal speed from
-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org]
On Behalf Of Michael Hunger
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:25 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Slow Traversals on Nodes with too many Relationships
That is rather a case of warming up your caches.
Determining
Re: [Neo4j] Slow Traversals on Nodes with too many
Relationships
I have to respectfully agree with Rick Bullotta.
I was suspecting the big-O is not linear for this case.
To verify I added x4 Container nodes (400.000) and their appropriate
Relationships, and it is now *unbelievably* slow
Pikoulas wrote:
Re: [Neo4j] Slow Traversals on Nodes with too many
Relationships
I have to respectfully agree with Rick Bullotta.
I was suspecting the big-O is not linear for this case.
To verify I added x4 Container nodes (400.000) and their appropriate
Relationships, and it is now
threads automatically.
Am 15.06.2011 um 17:40 schrieb Agelos Pikoulas:
Re: [Neo4j] Slow Traversals on Nodes with too many
Relationships
I have to respectfully agree with Rick Bullotta.
I was suspecting the big-O is not linear for this case.
To verify I added x4 Container nodes
the mailing list and it works
fine for me. Imho Gmail groups threads automatically.
Am 15.06.2011 um 17:40 schrieb Agelos Pikoulas:
Re: [Neo4j] Slow Traversals on Nodes with too many
Relationships
I have to respectfully agree with Rick Bullotta.
I was suspecting the big-O
:40 schrieb Agelos Pikoulas agelos.pikou...@gmail.com:
Re: [Neo4j] Slow Traversals on Nodes with too many
Relationships
I have to respectfully agree with Rick Bullotta.
I was suspecting the big-O is not linear for this case.
To verify I added x4 Container nodes (400.000
9 matches
Mail list logo