Neo4j isn't optimized to store big data blobs, so storing binaries as
byte[] properties isn't really recommended at the moment. There are
discussions on ways to enable such a feature and I'm guessing it'll
show up in later releases.
2010/6/22 go canal goca...@yahoo.com:
Hello,
Sorry, this maybe
Around what size of byte[] should i consider using some other storage
means than neo4j?
Could it be as easy as just storing the byte[] as a single file transparently?
-atle
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Mattias Persson
matt...@neotechnology.com wrote:
Neo4j isn't optimized to store big data
...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Atle Prange
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:30 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Store binary data with byte []
Around what size of byte[] should i consider using some other storage
means than neo4j?
Could it be as easy as just storing the byte[] as a single
2010/6/22 Atle Prange atle.pra...@gmail.com
Around what size of byte[] should i consider using some other storage
means than neo4j?
Hard to say, but if it's more than a couple of hundred bytes you should
consider other options.
Could it be as easy as just storing the byte[] as a single
[] internally so that would be no difference
there.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org]
On
Behalf Of Atle Prange
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:30 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Store binary data with byte
hundred characters each) and it worked quite well.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Mattias Persson
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 8:40 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Store binary data with byte
Hello,
Sorry, this maybe asked before - I saw byte [] is supported as property type. I
assume I can use that to store binary data, like attachments.
Is there any storage limit to it ? Will indexing/searching performance be
affected ?
Thanks,
canal
thanks,
canal
7 matches
Mail list logo
