Yes,
I am thinking along the lines of the Cypher return tables, see
http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/cypher-plugin.html in which
there is a column with Node representations, and a column with just a
String, etc.
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Tables look great. Just right now googled them.
Will they return something JSON encoded like [ row, row ],
where row is [ hash, hash ]?
-m.
On 06/15/2011 11:13 PM, Peter Neubauer wrote:
> Great!
>
> I plan to upgrade to Gremlin 1.1 tomorrow if the source is with me,
> and add support even for
Great!
I plan to upgrade to Gremlin 1.1 tomorrow if the source is with me,
and add support even for the table() return construct, so you can do
the full shebang there :)
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://ww
I was doing something wrong on my end. I could see the resulting map but
with different values in the web console from the rest plugin. It turns
out there was a lingering variable in the web console that I forgot to
reset and now I am getting the same values.
Thanks Peter.
-m.
On 06/15/2011 11:
Well,
you get as the result from your expression whatever the last statement
is, since from a script, there is only one return construct. You could
try putting things into a map or so ( both the count and the list of
nodes) and return that?
Alternatively, we could send back all bound variables in
Hey Peter,
I think I understand.
So that means I can get a sort listed of nodes (the contents of m keys),
but not the actual number on which the sorting was based (m values)?
-m.
On 06/15/2011 10:46 PM, Peter Neubauer wrote:
> Marcelo,
> the Gremlin plugin is transforming the results from a que
Marcelo,
the Gremlin plugin is transforming the results from a query into Neo4j
REST conform structures, while the console is a pure command line
interpreter, outputting strings that are not consumable by clients.
Does that make sense?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype
>
> n.outE.inV.inE.outV.groupCount(m) >> -1;m.sort{a,b -> b.value <=> a.value}
Yep, this versions runs and returns.
However the returned values from the web interface are different from
the ones via the gremlin plugin.
-m.
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@
Oops.
n.outE.inV.inE.outV.groupCount(m) >> -1;m.sort{a,b -> b.value <=> a.value}
NOT
n.outE.inV.inE.outV.groupCount(m);m.sort{a,b -> b.value <=> a.value} >> -1
I didn't see the semicolon.
Marko.
On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The trick to Gremlin is to know th
Hey Marko,
Wow, that was an *unbelievably* fast response. Amazing.
> Question: where are you setting the variable 'n' ? Is that Gremlin plugin
> thing?
>
It's unrelated to the neo4j plugin. Just an easy way for me to set up a
starting node.
-m.
___
Hi,
The trick to Gremlin is to know that an expression is an Iterator and thus,
must be iterated.
n.outE.inV.inE.outV.groupCount(m);m.sort{a,b -> b.value <=> a.value}
Should be:
n.outE.inV.inE.outV.groupCount(m);m.sort{a,b -> b.value <=> a.value} >>
-1
>> -1 is equivalent to
Hello neo4j,
I'm trying to run via the gremlin server plugin a query like:
m=[:];n.outE.inV.inE.outV.groupCount(m);m.sort{a,b -> b.value <=>
a.value}; m;
This doesn't output anything. I tried m.keySet() and that doesn't return
anything either.
Any ideas how I could make this work?
-m.
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
