[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-07-31 Thread Suneel Marthi
This is a call for Votes for Mahout 0.10.2 Release candidate available at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1011 Need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes for the RC to pass. Voting runs until Sunday Aug 2, 2015. Please verify the following: 1. Sigs and Hashes of Release arti

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-07-31 Thread Suneel Marthi
Verified {src} * {bin, tar} and all tests pass. +1 (binding) On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > This is a call for Votes for Mahout 0.10.2 Release candidate available at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1011 > > Need atleast 3 PMC +1 v

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-08-01 Thread Andrew Palumbo
Verified source tar and zip, all tests pass. Ran through all options of the classification and clustering examples in the binary tar.gz distribution in pseudo-cluster mode for MR and Spark without incident. Ran through one option each in the .zip Classification and Clustering examples in bo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-08-02 Thread Pat Ferrel
+1 (binding) — do we have to say binding? Why do we continue on Spark 1.2 when all distros have updated to Spark 1.3.1 long ago, and Spark has released 1.4 with 1.5 in the works. This is rather incomprehensible to me since we have the master 0.11.0, running on 1.4 ready to release. Can we plea

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-08-02 Thread Andrew Musselman
Is there any reason not to release 11 too? On Sunday, August 2, 2015, Pat Ferrel wrote: > +1 (binding) — do we have to say binding? > > Why do we continue on Spark 1.2 when all distros have updated to Spark > 1.3.1 long ago, and Spark has released 1.4 with 1.5 in the works. This is > rather inco

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-08-02 Thread Suneel Marthi
If u folks have not read the email from last friday that talks about both 0.10.2 and 0.11.0 releases this week, I would suggest that you please do. The plan is to release both 0.10.2 and 0.11.0 this week. Seems like we have some bandwidth in the PMC (atleast per the last 2 emails on this thread) t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-08-02 Thread Andrew Musselman
-1 unless this is operator error on my part. $ gpg --verify Downloads/apache-mahout-distribution-0.10.2-src.zip.asc gpg: no signed data gpg: can't hash datafile: file open error On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > If u folks have not read the email from last friday that talk

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-08-04 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (binding) verified all signatures and hashes, all tests pass on build from distribution source tarball On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote: > -1 unless this is operator error on my part. > > $ gpg --verify Downloads/apache-mahout-distribution-0.10.2-src.zip.asc > gpg: no si

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-08-04 Thread Andrew Musselman
This was user error, revoking my binding -1 vote. On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Andrew Musselman wrote: > -1 unless this is operator error on my part. > > $ gpg --verify Downloads/apache-mahout-distribution-0.10.2-src.zip.asc > gpg: no signed data > gpg: can't hash datafile: file open error >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-08-04 Thread Suneel Marthi
Thanks for the votes. The Voting for 0.10.2 is officially closed, we had 4 +1 votes and no objections, will send an announce once the release is finalized. On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Andrew Musselman wrote: > This was user error, revoking my binding -1 vote. > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 5:22

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.2 Release Candidate

2015-08-05 Thread Suneel Marthi
Cancelling the 0.10.2 Release, discovered a missing artifact which prevents the release from going thru. On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > Thanks for the votes. The Voting for 0.10.2 is officially closed, we had 4 > +1 votes and no objections, will send an announce once the