Sure, just look at Hadoop. But I'm not hung up on the port/starboard
numbering scheme either. Either 0.6.1 or 0.7 work for me.
On 2/22/12 11:46 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimovwrote:
I guess i still prefer 0.6.1 for maintenance releases (esp. given the
ok, sounds good. i am not fixated on names.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
>
>> I guess i still prefer 0.6.1 for maintenance releases (esp. given the
>> short cycle).
>>
>> Another supporting argument against even/o
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
> I guess i still prefer 0.6.1 for maintenance releases (esp. given the
> short cycle).
>
> Another supporting argument against even/odd scheme is that this
> naming doesn't really reflect the actual level of product maturity
> (e.g. 1.0 th
I guess i still prefer 0.6.1 for maintenance releases (esp. given the
short cycle).
Another supporting argument against even/odd scheme is that this
naming doesn't really reflect the actual level of product maturity
(e.g. 1.0 this way ends being a "new-feature-being-unstable-beta"?
whereas in real
Odd / Even releases for cleanup maintenance vs feature additions looks great.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:58 PM, John Conwell wrote:
> I think it sounds like a good idea.
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>
>> On recent threads on the dev@ list, and discussions off-list, it's
I think it sounds like a good idea.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> On recent threads on the dev@ list, and discussions off-list, it's pretty
> clear that we need to have "cleanup" be a priority for the next release.
>
> How about this for a formal proposal:
>
>
> - The
Aye say I.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:24 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>
> If we're able to wrap this release up cleanly and get quickly moving on to
> new features again, maybe we can try this on a more regular basis, with
> even releases being feature-work, and odd releases being ma
On Feb 22, 2012, at 7:24 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> On recent threads on the dev@ list, and discussions off-list, it's pretty
> clear that we need to have "cleanup" be a priority for the next release.
>
> How about this for a formal proposal:
>
>
> - The 0.7 release will have issues (both ne
On recent threads on the dev@ list, and discussions off-list, it's pretty
clear that we need to have "cleanup" be a priority for the next release.
How about this for a formal proposal:
- The 0.7 release will have issues (both new and on JIRA) be primarily
focused on bugfixes / cleanup /
