I think gokula isn't using mesos at all atm and is researching if there are
better options than his current failover environment.
Under the above assumption:
To answer gokula, yes mesos would allow you to use resources of multiple
machines, however I think the overhead of running multiple mesos
* Just a misconception in my first sentence I'd like to fix:
By default, Mesos never creates an offer with resources coming from two
different physical nodes (hosts).
The rest I keep. Sorry for that.
Hopefully it is clearer now,
/Abel
On 7/8/19 9:02 PM, Abel Souza wrote:
By default Mesos
By default Mesos never offers resources from two different physical
nodes. In order to do so, one has to create his/her own scheduler
enabling the management of (perhaps many) different Mesos offers so to
satisfy higher level framework constraints.
People usually suggest using Marathon to
Hi Gokula,
Not sure I follow what you are asking here. What do you mean by one node is
active and other passive at any point in time? Are you saying your
framework (marathon?) is launching all your web-servers on a single node
whereas you want them to be distributed evenly across 2 nodes? If yes,
Dear All,
Thanks in advance and need your inputs for my requirement.
I have 2 nodes (physical machines)
There 20+ web servers running
2 nodes are in active and passive mode
Problem: At any point in time only one node is active and other node is
passive.
Solution: want to use the capacity of both
5 matches
Mail list logo
