Jake - i think that would be wonderful!
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> I've been maintaining a deb/rpm set for Mesos and for Aurora and Thrift we
> have been using the infra supported Bintray to make it available to the
> community via http://www.apache.org/dist/${projec
I've also filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3416 to track
the immediate need for the egg of 0.24.0.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
> I attempted to upgrade to 0.24.0 but noticed python eggs are not yet on
> PyPI [1]. Can someone post them? Also,
I attempted to upgrade to 0.24.0 but noticed python eggs are not yet on
PyPI [1]. Can someone post them? Also, is there a plan to include egg
publishing with the regular release process?
[1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mesos.interface
t; tutorial/docs on the nifty features in aurora :-)
>
> -- Ankur
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 2, 2014, Bill Farner wrote:
>
>> Another alternative is for the scheduler to reliably place your instances
>> on the same hosts every time. This comes with its own pitfal
Another alternative is for the scheduler to reliably place your instances
on the same hosts every time. This comes with its own pitfalls, but isn't
rolling the dice as much as hoping a whole replica set is not moved.
Aurora, for example, implements this with a 'dedicated' scheduling
constraint sp
I'll echo Sharma's points. While it seems simple enough to see which
moving parts you need to implement here, the long-term effort is large.
I've been working on Aurora for 4.5 years, and still know of a lot of work
we need to do. If your use case can fit into an existing framework
(perhaps mod
I'm Bill Farner, tech lead of the Aurora team at Twitter for the past 4+
years, and an Aurora committer. I will be giving a talk detailing some of
the history of Aurora, and explaining some new features we have on the
roadmap. We Aurora developers have been really excited to see the pr
Mesos requires globally-unique task IDs. This error indicates that you
have provided the same ID for two tasks (field TaskInfo.taskId).
-=Bill
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Sai Sagar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the message "Task has duplicate ID" from the task status
> after calling laun
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Dan Colish wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Benjamin Mahler <
> benjamin.mah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've replied inline below, also cc'ed some of the Aurora / Thermos
>> developers to better answer your questions.
>>
>
> Thank you very much! I'll respon
Ben pretty accurately described how Aurora fills some of these duties, but
Dan is right — we're still on the cusp of being *really* open sourced, so
it's not very usable yet. Once our incubator vote is over, i hope to
promptly change this so outside users and contributors can dive in.
-=Bill
On
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Bernerd Schaefer
wrote:
> Thanks for the response, Bill. Some followups below.
>
>
>> I haven't found a great way to approach either of these in mesos without
>>> assuming that your framework has full control of the cluster. This is
>>> covered a bit in the Omega
(apologies if this breaks threading, i'm replying after subscribing this
email address)
Great questions! Some responses below from my experience and perspective
formed while working on Aurora.
2. For a service scheduler built today, how much is Mesos responsible for
> and
> how much the framewor
to see this soon, as we're preparing to release our
code very soon as a part of our proposal for apache incubation [1]!
-=Bill
[1]
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Aurora-for-Incubation-td36288.html
-=Bill
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Bill Farner wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
