Not a problem. figured it out.
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 11/8/2007 10:16 PM:
> Sorry BJ, Scott,
>
> This was my fault
>
> Jacques
>
> De : "Scott Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Ah ok I understand now, fixed in rev. 593419. Thanks BJ
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On 09/11/2007, BJ Freeman <[EMAIL
Hi,
Please can any one tell me what is the difference between these two fileds.
1) LAST_UPDATED_STAMP,
2) LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP
Thanks
Ramesh
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Looking-for-difference...-tf4778565.html#a13669940
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list ar
please specify the version of SVN you are using.
also where you saw LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP.
I am guessing this is opentaps.
if so you should ask in their forum.
https://sourceforge.net/forum/?group_id=145855
vuppla sent the following on 11/9/2007 8:05 AM:
> Hi,
>
> Please can any one tell me what
sorry.
searched for the LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP
instead of lastUpdatedTxStamp
you will find this in
/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/model/modelentity.java
BJ Freeman sent the following on 11/9/2007 8:13 AM:
> please specify the version of SVN you are using.
> also where you saw LAST_UPDATED_T
TX means transaction here
Jacques
De : "vuppla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi,
>
> Please can any one tell me what is the difference between these two fileds.
>
> 1) LAST_UPDATED_STAMP,
>
> 2) LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP
>
> Thanks
> Ramesh
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabb
Ah a trunk update. Darn
David E Jones sent the following on 11/8/2007 10:23 AM:
>
> Not sure where you've looked so far to find this, but it does exist. The
> name of the entity is PartyCarrierAccount.
>
> To find stuff like this the easiest thing is to browse around either the
> entitymodel.xml
--On Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:30 PM +0100 Jacopo Cappellato
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I apologize but I was not very clear. I do really think that the metadata
(data model) information is a *valuable* source of information and should
really stay in the trunk, your work will be of great he
Kenneth,
If the entity reference was set up in the Wiki as I proposed, then anyone wanting to contribute
toward updating the Wiki entity reference would simply submit a patch to Jira. With one patch two
things are kept up to date - the source code and the Wiki.
-Adrian
Kenneth Porter wrote:
To my knowledge only submission to the Jira with the Apache license
approval are committed.
Kenneth Porter sent the following on 11/9/2007 10:50 AM:
> --On Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:30 PM +0100 Jacopo Cappellato
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I apologize but I was not very clear. I do rea
De : "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --On Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:30 PM +0100 Jacopo Cappellato
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I apologize but I was not very clear. I do really think that the metadata
> > (data model) information is a *valuable* source of information and should
>
Thanks for response. Actually i was searched ofbiz documentation i didn't see
anywhere this kind of infrmation like what is the basic use of these two
fields. Actually in the database these 2 fileds are representing same data.
Menas its showing same date and time.
1) LAST_UPDATED_STAMP
2) LAS
I suggest you look at the code I referred you to and understand it.
then you can evaluate what has to be done.
The database maintainence page is entity based not DB based.
I believe you need to understand how the framework operates.
vuppla sent the following on 11/9/2007 1:46 PM:
> Thanks for
vuppla wrote:
Thanks for response. Actually i was searched ofbiz documentation i didn't see
anywhere this kind of infrmation like what is the basic use of these two
fields. Actually in the database these 2 fileds are representing same data.
Menas its showing same date and time.
1) LAST_UPDATED_
On 11/8/07, Vince M. Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Interesting. So would it be possible to add this to a controller.xml in
> our custom component, run all requests thru cms first to try and match the
> content alias, and then run thru standard controller? This would avoid
> having to use an
unsubscribe
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Mailing+Lists
Steven Williamson wrote:
unsubscribe
BJ
Are you suggesting there is new functionality related to this in OfBiz trunk?
I found the entity David referred to, but the only place I'm finding related
services is in opentaps-common. I haven't searched OfBiz trunk yet because we
do not sync with trunk on production environments.
Vinc
The commit ML shows commits relative to this entity after the ver4.0
branch, which I use for production.
did not look at it closely since this is not something I am focusing on
right now.
Vince M. Clark sent the following on 11/9/2007 3:40 PM:
> BJ
>
> Are you suggesting there is new functional
I am importing several million sales records in a test run using the derby database. I let it run all night and it averaged about 8000 records an hour and my CPU utilization averaged under 10%.I stopped and restarted it to clear out the log files and when I restarted it, my CPU utilization is now
might want to ask in the derby ML
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following on 11/9/2007 6:09 PM:
> I am importing several million sales records in a test run using the derby
> database. I let it run all night and it averaged about 8000 records an hour
> and
> my CPU utilization averaged under 10%.
in the code I referenced
/** The name of the time stamp field for locking/syncronization */
vuppla sent the following on 11/9/2007 1:46 PM:
> Thanks for response. Actually i was searched ofbiz documentation i didn't see
> anywhere this kind of infrmation like what is the basic use of these two
21 matches
Mail list logo
