Re: ofbiz entity sync.

Hi Deyan, Thanks for your clear explanation and suggestion. As I'm busy with another stuff, I have quickly put your comment as a quote in OFBIZ- . Jacques - Original Message - From: Deyan Tsvetanov To: Jacques Le Roux Cc: Hans Bakker ; m...@emforium.com Sent: Tuesday,

Calling groovy from scheduled job (OFVIZ 9.04)

Hello, I have created a scheduled job to run at certain time. The job calls my service which I define as the followoing: Auto-notification Certificate Expiry RunAutoNotification.groovy is as follows (omitting the import): try { AutoNotification notification = new

Deleting a Skill Standard Entry for a Task

Hi all, using the ofBiz Project Manager module, is it possible to delete a Skill Standard Entry for a Task (Project > Tasks > Skill Standards)? (comment: Apparently only the "Update" option is available for each entry). Many thanks in advance for your help, Armando

Re: Deleting a Skill Standard Entry for a Task

i think on this screen u can't ... a workaround is to set the duration to zero, but the skill will stay. But it's a good point to add a button to delete a skill from a task! So long \ Sascha 2010/4/6 Bertuzzi, Armando [Nervianoms] > Hi all, > using the ofBiz Project Manager module, is it possi

RE: Deleting a Skill Standard Entry for a Task

Thanks for your quick answer! Armando -Original Message- From: Sascha Rodekamp [mailto:sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:15 PM To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Deleting a Skill Standard Entry for a Task i think on this screen u can't ... a wor

Re: Calling groovy from scheduled job (OFVIZ 9.04)

You can get the delegator from the dispatch context, which is populated in the binding for groovy services as "dctx". delegator = dctx.getDelegator(); // add to RunAutoNotification.groovy On Apr 6, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Koon Sang wrote: Hello, I have created a scheduled job to run at certain

Re: JUNK->Re: ofbiz entity sync.

Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Deyan, Thanks for your clear explanation and suggestion. As I'm busy with another stuff, I have quickly put your comment as a quote in OFBIZ- . There is however a major issue that CAN NOT be fixed in the current implementation: the list and sequence of entities

Question regarding Data security by permissions

Hi all, I am starting to engage myself in ofbiz and I have a question regarding the data shown in several forms. Is it possible to limit the access to this data for special groups too? So that one group is able to read the data only, another group can read and write and the third one can't even r

Could not get DataSource javax.naming.CommunicationException

Hi All, i am using opensymphony for the workflow. but sometime when i run this service get this exception if any one know the reason of this exception then please reply. 2010-04-06 17:57:09,147 (http-0.0.0.0-81-3) [ JDBCPropertySet.java:130:FATAL] Could not get DataSource javax.naming.Commun

Re: Could not get DataSource javax.naming.CommunicationException

I am not familiar with opensymphony. however you having two programs access a db with no synchronization. this can cause random problems for both programs. my suggestion is you use the DB layer or even the delegator of ofbiz so all calls, to the db, go through ofbiz. = BJ

Re: Question regarding Data security by permissions

as a couple of days ago there was a new implementation of security that I have not got familiar with, in the trunk. before that changes the permission is based on login and the permissions in the service and UI components. each of what you say is available. Also we have a portal that is keyed to th

Re: JUNK->Re: ofbiz entity sync.

From: "Adrian Crum" Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Deyan, Thanks for your clear explanation and suggestion. As I'm busy with another stuff, I have quickly put your comment as a quote in OFBIZ- . There is however a major issue that CAN NOT be fixed in the current implementation: the list and

Re: ofbiz entity sync.

Jacques Le Roux wrote: From: "Adrian Crum" Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Deyan, Thanks for your clear explanation and suggestion. As I'm busy with another stuff, I have quickly put your comment as a quote in OFBIZ- . There is however a major issue that CAN NOT be fixed in the current imp

Re: Question about add-ons

Neogia addons-manager is very young, only one year, so some technical parts should be enhance, but I don't think it's the more important point of discussion. Why addons and for what ? Which constrains for a addon for being publishable ? Currently in Neogia, we are trying to answer each of thes

Re: ofbiz entity sync.

From: "Adrian Crum" Jacques Le Roux wrote: From: "Adrian Crum" Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Deyan, Thanks for your clear explanation and suggestion. As I'm busy with another stuff, I have quickly put your comment as a quote in OFBIZ- . There is however a major issue that CAN NOT be fixe

Re: JUNK->Re: ofbiz entity sync.

Hi Adrian, yes , my current approach is database specific. It was implemented under pressure when I found out that ofbiz sync does not work, at least in my setup :) So my suggestion and idea is to implement database independent solution, I would do it but may be in few months. The approach sugg

Re: Deleting a Skill Standard Entry for a Task

No problem i'm on vacation at the momement. i will make me a reminder and have a look next week when i'm back in the office :-) Cheers Sascha 2010/4/6 Bertuzzi, Armando [Nervianoms] > Thanks for your quick answer! > Armando > > -Original Message- > From: Sascha Rodekamp [mailto:sascha.

Re: JUNK->Re: ofbiz entity sync.

Deyan Tsvetanov wrote: Hi Adrian, yes , my current approach is database specific. It was implemented under pressure when I found out that ofbiz sync does not work, at least in my setup :) So my suggestion and idea is to implement database independent solution, I would do it but may be in few m

Re: JUNK->Re: ofbiz entity sync.

Here is an example: On server A ( the one that pushes data ) we insert the following records with the following sequence and timestamps: PARTY : party_id: 1000 , created_timestamp_tx : 6-APR -2010 20:00:00.010 PARTY_GROUP : party_group_id : 1000 ( FK to PARTY.party_id ) , created_timestamp_t

Re: ofbiz entity sync.

Deyan Tsvetanov wrote: Here is an example: On server A ( the one that pushes data ) we insert the following records with the following sequence and timestamps: PARTY : party_id: 1000 , created_timestamp_tx : 6-APR -2010 20:00:00.010 PARTY_GROUP : party_group_id : 1000 ( FK to PARTY.party_i

Re: JUNK->Re: ofbiz entity sync.

From: "Deyan Tsvetanov" Hi Adrian, yes , my current approach is database specific. It was implemented under pressure when I found out that ofbiz sync does not work, at least in my setup :) So my suggestion and idea is to implement database independent solution, I would do it but may be in few

Re: New OFBiz stable release

Hi, We are into April 1020. How does everybody feel about creating new release branch 10.4? IMO, we should create one sooner then later. Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" On Mar 21, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Ashish Vijay

Re: New OFBiz stable release

my understanding we muse first get 9.04 to a full release before making a release candidate 10.4. there is discussion on the dev list Japaco ask for input on 9.04 = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation

Re: New OFBiz stable release

On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 16:48 -0400, Anil Patel wrote: > Hi, > We are into April 1020. How does everybody feel about creating new release > branch 10.4? Wow, I need to set my clock back 1000 years or so... Have you got a hot tub time machine? Or was this sent by RFC 1149? Sorry, just made me

question about order adjustments

I'm looking at OrderReadHelper, and a list of adjustments is a parameter to the constructor. What is the type and related entity of adjustments? I did a couple of searches but I couldn't quite find it. Thanks Patrick

Re: New OFBiz stable release

I don't think the ordering is important, they are both valid and independent discussions to be having. Regards Scott On 6/04/2010, at 3:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > my understanding we muse first get 9.04 to a full release before making > a release candidate 10.4. > there is discussion on the dev

Re: question about order adjustments

Just use one of the other constructors :-) Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 6/04/2010, at 3:23 PM, Patrick wrote: > I'm looking at OrderReadHelper, and a list of adjustments is a > parameter to the constructor. What is the type and related entity of > adjustments? I di

Re: Calling groovy from scheduled job (OFVIZ 9.04)

Thanks, Joe. It is working fine now. -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Calling-groovy-from-scheduled-job-OFVIZ-9-04-tp1752673p1753750.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Getting OFBiz source code

Hello you, I want to get source code of OFBiz to develop and customize. what version of OFBiz should I get? trunk or release? I look forward to hearing from you! Thks & Brs, SONLT

Re: Getting OFBiz source code

this is a good launch point to get information http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Documentation+Index this is a good group for providing patches http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Apache+OFBiz+Contribution+and+Development and this is the one you ask about h