...at the end, you
save time with that!
Kindly
Robert
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Java-Service-Classes-tp4634814p4634912.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
a bundle of services, which run all together with
just one call..
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Java-Service-Classes-tp4634814p4634819.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-groups
with that you can call a bundle of services, which run all together with
just one call..
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Java-Service-Classes-tp4634814p4634819.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Prabhakar,
The scenario you are given is not properly executed because, in this
case the second event(viewEmployee) doesn't works for either success or
failure of event(createEmployee). Thus to successfully execute this you
have to provide response 'type=request' for first event which on
hi Prabhakar,
In this scenario , your second event will not get executed because
after getting response success(or error) from first event it will not
return back to call the second event.
For achieving required functionality you can use response
type=request-redirect in your first
Prabhakar,
You can't call runSync in this way because it is wrong
syntactically, you have to pass map as parameter while calling runSync.
Also you can pass empty map as parameter but in this case service will
return error : IN parameter is missing.
Regards
Mayank Sheth
On 07/13/2012
Why dont you use service-groups
with that you can call a bundle of services, which run all together with
just one call..
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Java-Service-Classes-tp4634814p4634819.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
