Hello all!
Just wondering if some of the readers here were using OFBiz in Canada,
or even better, in Quebec! My company is considering the use of OFBiz,
and as such I'm in charge of researching on the matter. We would like
to hear from your experience!
Thank you all. :)
Olivier Tremblay
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier Tremblay"
To: "OFBiz Newsletter"
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:03:27 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: OFBiz in Canada?
Hello all!
Just wondering if some of the readers here were using OFBiz in Canada,
or even better, in Q
: "Olivier Tremblay"
To: "OFBiz Newsletter"
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:03:27 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
Eastern
Subject: OFBiz in Canada?
Hello all!
Just wondering if some of the readers here were using OFBiz in Canada,
or even better, in Quebec! My company is consid
sletter"
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:03:27 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
Eastern
Subject: OFBiz in Canada?
Hello all!
Just wondering if some of the readers here were using OFBiz in Canada,
or even better, in Quebec! My company is considering the use of OFBiz,
and as such I'm in
very broad and deep. Not
sure if you are thinking o using only ecommerce side of it or more
or less.
Harmeet
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier Tremblay"
To: "OFBiz Newsletter"
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:03:27 AM GMT -05:00 US/
Canada Eastern
S
ot;OFBiz Newsletter"
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:03:27 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
Eastern
Subject: OFBiz in Canada?
Hello all!
Just wondering if some of the readers here were using OFBiz in Canada,
or even better, in Quebec! My company is considering the use of OFBiz,
and as such I&
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:03:27 AM GMT -05:00 US/
Canada Eastern
Subject: OFBiz in Canada?
Hello all!
Just wondering if some of the readers here were using OFBiz in
Canada,
or even better, in Quebec! My company is considering the use of
OFBiz,
and as such I'm in charge
o using only ecommerce side of it or
more or less.
Harmeet
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier Tremblay"
To: "OFBiz Newsletter"
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:03:27 AM GMT -05:00
US/Canada Eastern
Subject: OFBiz in Canada?
Hello all!
Just wondering if some of t
ad and deep.
Not sure if you are thinking o using only ecommerce side of it
or more or less.
Harmeet
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier Tremblay"
To: "OFBiz Newsletter"
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:03:27 AM GMT -05:00
US/Canada Eastern
Subject: OFBiz in
al Message -
From: "Olivier Tremblay"
To: "OFBiz Newsletter"
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:03:27 AM GMT -05:00
US/Canada Eastern
Subject: OFBiz in Canada?
Hello all!
Just wondering if some of the readers here were using OFBiz in
Canada,
or even better, in Que
t it has a learning curve. A lot depends on
how you want to use it. Our usage of ofbiz is very broad and
deep. Not sure if you are thinking o using only ecommerce side
of it or more or less.
Harmeet
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier Tremblay"
To: "OFBiz Newsletter"
On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:34 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Ofbiz community seems to be focused on making ofbiz generate as much
consulting revenue as possible and not on making ofbiz a great
shrink wrapped product. For example, end users having to use svn
and patches so to keep their systems up
Are you saying that there are now enough contributors to implement a
good release plan?
Many thanks,
Chris
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:34 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Ofbiz community seems to be focused on making ofbiz generate as much
consulting revenue as possible and n
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:34 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Ofbiz community seems to be focused on making ofbiz generate as much
consulting revenue as possible and not on making ofbiz a great
shrink wrapped product. For example, end users having to use svn
and patches
Yes we need more solid teams, this is improving...
Jacques
From: "Christopher Snow"
Are you saying that there are now enough contributors to implement a
good release plan?
Many thanks,
Chris
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:34 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Ofbiz community se
Not having a stable release is certainly a hindrance in OFBiz adapter.
Even though we have release branch, there is no released binaries which
runs without development time tool chain. I can commit my time to:
1. Write ant target/Maven goals to create a binary only release.
2. Write an nice lo
;>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ofbiz is a fantastic enterprise application development
> >>>>>>> framework if you want to create your own apps.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ofbiz needs a lot of customization to f
So it's the chicken-and-egg situtation?
There are not enough contributors to focus on making stable releases
and documentation. But without stable releases and documentation, new
contributors are not attracted to ofbiz.
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes we need more solid teams, this is improvin
From: "Christopher Snow"
So it's the chicken-and-egg situtation?
No : it's improving and the curve is not exponential nor even quadratic but is more than flat.
Actually this is very clear since we released 9.04
And maybe the new effort which may happend on SME will increase even more this
c
Hi Raj,
This would be surely very appreciated!
BTW what about OFBIZ-1560 ;o)
Jacques
From: "Raj Saini"
Not having a stable release is certainly a hindrance in OFBiz adapter.
Even though we have release branch, there is no released binaries which
runs without development time tool chain. I
On Nov 12, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
> So it's the chicken-and-egg situtation?
Well, this is true in some ways: the OFBiz user/contributor base is growing
every day but apparently the critical mass that will allow it to maintain and
implement a good release plan is still not
Christopher,
Sorry this is maybe a bit a technical answer, but I believe it shows another
mindset
One of the causes, which is maybe hidden for philosophical and pragmatical reasons, is that we (should) always use RTC mode
(Review-Then-Commit)
For more on this apect you could be interested by
Unrelated: +1 thread hijack :P
Back to the discussed matter:
As a programmer, I'd be interested to know more about how I can help.
I'm not really used to open-source projects, but I'm going to have to
implement this solution for my company. Which is why I want to find
other Canadian (prefe
Hi Olivier,
Try this link to give you an idéa:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best+Practices
-André
> Unrelated: +1 thread hijack :P
>
> Back to the discussed matter:
>
> As a programmer, I'd be interested to know more about how I can help.
> I'm not really used to op
From: "Olivier Tremblay"
Unrelated: +1 thread hijack :P
Yes, but if you read it all you will find that some ideas there matter and are
related to the subject Chris submitted
This said, sorry for the thread hijack but it was Chris's actually ;o)
Jacques
Back to the discussed matter:
As
Yes, I take the credit for the hijack!
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Olivier Tremblay"
Unrelated: +1 thread hijack :P
Yes, but if you read it all you will find that some ideas there matter
and are related to the subject Chris submitted
This said, sorry for the thread hijack but it was Ch
Well, regarding participation, we just had an excellent Talk about
participating in open source - and guess what even more detailed: on ASF -
projects here at W-JAX 2009 in Munich.
It was especially of interest, since it drew a couple of examples what the
motivation of people would be to participa
Hi Carsten,
Theses are very good questions but difficult to answer. For me it's more a felling than numbers. For the moment I only use this
metric http://tinyurl.com/yb3h4hv. So you see it's more in survival mode.
Also I presume that it would be difficult to organize things (and even more people
I feel it is worth looking at the other way too.
If ofbiz were to move towards reusing projects like hibernate and spring and
generalize some of the cool concepts into reusable libraries packaged through
something like Apache Commons or ofbiz subprojects it would drive adoption. By
resuable i m
It would be a good idea a full integration of Maven2 on Ofbiz? it is already
considered/done? I think it may be helpful to control the release mechanism
and also gives the ability to separate everything in modules as Harmet
said.
For example, Ofbiz core would be the main module and all the compomen
Ofbiz is an excellent application development framework. I think that
any efforts that would focus on selling this aspect would attract
newcomers to the project. In the past, I have recommended ofbiz as a
development framework to a few architects and senior developers that I
have worked with.
her Snow [mailto:sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: 13 Nopember 2009 15:18
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: OFBiz in Canada?
Ofbiz is an excellent application development framework. I think that
any efforts that would focus on selling this aspect would attract
newcomers to the project.
pember 2009 15:18
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: OFBiz in Canada?
Ofbiz is an excellent application development framework. I think that
any efforts that would focus on selling this aspect would attract
newcomers to the project. In the past, I have recommended ofbiz as a
developmen
ast".
>> The Beast for the newcomers, but if we understand the framework,
>> you will find "The Beauty of the OFBiz".
>>
>> - Charles TJ
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christopher Snow [mailto:sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk]
>&g
The Beast for the newcomers, but if we understand the framework,
>> you will find "The Beauty of the OFBiz".
>>
>> - Charles TJ
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christopher Snow [mailto:sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk]
>> Sen
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Nov 13, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
If a company start using ofbiz for small applications using just the development framework, they can be very productive within a few weeks.
However, if they have to take on board the whole of ofbiz (i.e. the comp
>>>
>>>> I am agree with you Chris, the OFBiz is an excellent framework;
>>>> OFBiz is like "The Beauty and The Beast".
>>>> The Beast for the newcomers, but if we understand the framework,
>>>> you will find "The Beauty of the OF
o:sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: 13 Nopember 2009 15:18
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: OFBiz in Canada?
Ofbiz is an excellent application development framework. I think that any
efforts that would focus on selling this aspect would attract newcomers to
the project. In the past, I ha
That's the approach I tried when I ran into dependency problems. This
then worried me that if I did fix the dependency problem I found, what
other dependency issues would I run into later down the line?
A developer learning ofbiz doesn't need to think about component
dependencies on top of le
ty and The Beast".
>>>> The Beast for the newcomers, but if we understand the framework,
>>>> you will find "The Beauty of the OFBiz".
>>>>
>>>> - Charles TJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
> I was thinking about your comment of leaving the components in place even
> though they are not used. Does leaving unused components in place have a
> performance impact on ofbiz? Do those components consume memory? - they are
> certain
gt; >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I am agree with you Chris, the OFBiz is an excellent framework;
> >>>> OFBiz is like "The Beauty and The Beast".
> >>>> The Beast for the newcomers, but if we understand the framework,
> >&
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
I was thinking about your comment of leaving the components in place even
though they are not used. Does leaving unused components in place have a
performance impact on ofbiz? Do those components consume memor
On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I was thinking about your comment of leaving the components in place even
>>> though they are not used. Does leaving unused components in place
Also, there's the security issues of having code running that isn't required.
Anyway, I get the picture. A modular ofbiz is not an option! People in control
like ofbiz just the way it is - it suits their business model.
No, you didn't get the picture, at all.
Please read the messages c
t: Re: OFBiz in Canada?
That's the approach I tried when I ran into dependency problems. This
then worried me that if I did fix the dependency problem I found, what
other dependency issues would I run into later down the line?
A developer learning ofbiz doesn't need to think
On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
>
>>> Also, there's the security issues of having code running that isn't
>>> required.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I get the picture. A modular ofbiz is not an option! People in
>>> control like ofbiz just the way it is - it suits their business model
Chris,
Very few things are ever not an option, but just because someone turns
up on the mailing list out of nowhere and proposes something vague
doesn't mean that it is suddenly a valid idea that everyone should
take seriously. OFBiz like every other apache project is a
meritocracy, the
Scott,
I agree that the community changes ofbiz by committing. And as a
non-committer and just and end user, all I have is a voice.
I just found the arguments against the proposal to be unfounded and not
in the best interests of the ofbiz project. For example, the comment
about disk space
I had the same complaint at one time.
I now keep my own version under a different brand name.
That is about all you can do.
Christopher Snow sent the following on 11/13/2009 2:40 AM:
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I was thinking abo
framework;
>>>> OFBiz is like "The Beauty and The Beast".
>>>> The Beast for the newcomers, but if we understand the framework,
>>>> you will find "The Beauty of the OFBiz".
>>>>
>>>> - Charles TJ
>>>>
>>>
derstand the framework,
you will find "The Beauty of the OFBiz".
- Charles TJ
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Snow [mailto:sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: 13 Nopember 2009 15:18
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: OFBiz in Canada?
Ofbiz is an excellent application de
Thanks BJ - that's the conclusion I'm starting to reach.
Perhaps it would be worth some of us like minded people to getting together?
BJ Freeman wrote:
I had the same complaint at one time.
I now keep my own version under a different brand name.
That is about all you can do.
Christopher Snow
Thanks Jacques!
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This may help
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
Jacques
From: "Christopher Snow"
When I tried to remove the unwanted components, I can into dependency
problems. A modular approach to using the components
On Nov 13, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I agree that the community changes ofbiz by committing. And as a
> non-committer and just and end user, all I have is a voice.
>
> I just found the arguments against the proposal to be unfounded and not in
> the best interest
On 14/11/2009, at 12:32 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Scott,
I agree that the community changes ofbiz by committing. And as a
non-committer and just and end user, all I have is a voice.
Time spent in the community and contributions made is what determines
how loud a voice is.
I just foun
; I am agree with you Chris, the OFBiz is an excellent framework;
>>>> OFBiz is like "The Beauty and The Beast".
>>>> The Beast for the newcomers, but if we understand the framework,
>>>> you will find "The Beauty of the OFBiz".
>>>>
From: "Christopher Snow"
Scott,
I agree that the community changes ofbiz by committing. And as a
non-committer and just and end user, all I have is a voice.
You can also create Jira and patches... Of course discussing about it before is
always better...
I just found the arguments agains
From the work I have done on creating an Eclipse application, I quite
like the OSGi plugin concept. OSGi may help ofbiz in areas like
dependency management and hot upgrades. Maven 2 would be suitable as
the build tool.
There is a lot to learn about OSGi first though...
Please feel free to
I would like to get involved on the development prototype for Maven
integration. I've worked with it in a few projects and I love it so much.
But to be realistic I need more time to improve my knwoledge of the entire
framework and Maven too in order to do a good work. I don't want to start
the hous
Hi Chris,
I have created a prototype integration of OFBiz and OSGI at source
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/ofbiz-osgi/). This runs OFBiz as a
framework inside a OSGi Kernal. As of now it loads framework as well as
application. I have tested the service engine and entity engine and both
wor
Hi Chris:
IMHO: Having watched the project for a long time now, I think it is time
for a fork in the road. There are too many competing interests here.
This sort of reminds me of Unix before AT& T let BSD birth. No? And look
what that spawned :-)
Ruth
Christopher Snow wrote:
Thanks BJ - th
I personally feel a binary only distribution will be very helpful which
does not need any of the build time tool chain such a Ant, Maven or SVN
to pull the sources. It should be like any other standard distribution
of Tomcat, Geronimo or any other application.
Extending the existing ant script
Hi Raj, this sounds great! Was there any interest from the ofbiz community?
Raj Saini wrote:
Hi Chris,
I have created a prototype integration of OFBiz and OSGI at source
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/ofbiz-osgi/). This runs OFBiz as a
framework inside a OSGi Kernal. As of now it loads fra
Hi Raj,
I wonder why, if this uses OFBiz only, the doc is at
http://opentaps.org/docs/index.php/Ofbiz-osgi-prototype
and there is nothing in official Apache OFBiz documentation (wiki) ?
Is there any reasons ?
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Raj Saini"
Hi Chris,
I have created a prototype integrati
No, not so far.
Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Raj, this sounds great! Was there any interest from the ofbiz
community?
Raj Saini wrote:
Hi Chris,
I have created a prototype integration of OFBiz and OSGI at source
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/ofbiz-osgi/). This runs OFBiz as a
framework i
On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Chris:
>
> IMHO: Having watched the project for a long time now, I think it is time for
> a fork in the road. There are too many competing interests here.
Uh... I am missing your point now: what are the competing interests that you
are ment
Hi Jacques,
Opentap guy has helped in creating the documentation as they are planing
to use it for their product. I had created the prototype to develop
OFBiz based application for our own products. Integration project itself
is Apache 2.0 licensed and does not use any code form Opentaps. It d
Hi Jacopo,
This is my understanding of the conflict in interest:
1) Ofbiz as an ecommerce focused application with ERP that is developed
on top of unstable trunk and kept updated via svn and patches.
versus
2) Ofbiz as a stable shrink wrapped ERP application that has
professional releases a
hi Ruth,
I do agree with you that it is time for a fork in the road. But before that,
maybe it is better to split ofbiz into subprojects, like framework, BI, etc.
Then we can choose where to fork. And also the future merge should be
easier.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu (xudong)
www.wizitsoft.com | Offi
I do not think OFBiz fork would be a best think to do in the interest f
community. However, idea of a next generation OFBiz (OFBiz-NG) keep
coming to mind. That was the one of the reason I worked on OFBiz-OSGi
integration. OFBiz with a micro kernel based on OFBiz and then other
building blocks
That makes a lot of sense.
Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:
hi Ruth,
I do agree with you that it is time for a fork in the road. But before that,
maybe it is better to split ofbiz into subprojects, like framework, BI, etc.
Then we can choose where to fork. And also the future merge should be
easier.
Hi Raj,
Sure a wiki page would be wecolme, and without any doubts, I will I will put a
link from the FAQ!
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Raj Saini"
Hi Jacques,
Opentap guy has helped in creating the documentation as they are planing
to use it for their product. I had created the prototype to devel
On Nov 13, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> This is my understanding of the conflict in interest:
>
> 1) Ofbiz as an ecommerce focused application with ERP that is developed on
> top of unstable trunk and kept updated via svn and patches.
>
> versus
>
> 2) Ofbiz as
Remember though that OFBiz has begun and stay as an ERP project...
I prefer by far Raj's intentions
Jacques
From: "Michael Xu (xudong)"
hi Ruth,
I do agree with you that it is time for a fork in the road. But before that,
maybe it is better to split ofbiz into subprojects, like framework, BI,
Here is the release plan so far
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan
Jacques
From: "Christopher Snow"
Hi Jacopo,
This is my understanding of the conflict in interest:
1) Ofbiz as an ecommerce focused application with ERP that is developed on top of unstable trunk and kept upda
Michael,
why do you think it is time for a fork? It seems to me a crazy conversation...
Jacopo
On Nov 13, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:
> hi Ruth,
>
> I do agree with you that it is time for a fork in the road. But before that,
> maybe it is better to split ofbiz into subproject
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Nov 13, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
This is my understanding of the conflict in interest:
1) Ofbiz as an ecommerce focused application with ERP that is developed on top
of unstable trunk and kept updated via svn and patches.
versus
2)
It smells the same syndrome that Neogia 5 years ago ;)
Nicolas
> Michael,
>
> why do you think it is time for a fork? It seems to me a crazy
> conversation...
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:
>
>> hi Ruth,
>>
>> I do agree with you that it is time for a fork
Christopher Snow wrote:
It would be interesting to know how many of the committers for ofbiz
that DON'T use ofbiz primarily for ecommerce. I think that would be the
main stumbling block to separating the core development framework.
My employer does not use OFBiz for eCommerce. We use the Asse
This means having also a BD populated, right ? Else OFBiz is useless.
I can't see any reasons why we did not make it previsously, but I have the
intution there is at least one
So far : http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan
All good wills are welcome
Jacques
From: "Raj Saini"
I
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Nov 13, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
This is my understanding of the conflict in interest:
1) Ofbiz as an ecommerce focused application with ERP that is developed on top
of unstable trunk and kept updated via svn and patches.
versus
2) Of
I think you mean DB right? Yes, indeed that is needed. May be some thing
like ofbizsetup component can be run as a default application first time
and have a option to load the demo data, seed or setup specific data.
Thanks,
Raj
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This means having also a BD populated, ri
I have some clients who use the POS alone
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Christopher Snow wrote:
It would be interesting to know how many of the committers for ofbiz
that DON'T use ofbiz primarily for ecommerce. I think that would be the
main stumbling block to separating the core development
> Christopher Snow wrote:
>> It would be interesting to know how many of the committers for ofbiz that
>> DON'T use ofbiz primarily for ecommerce. I think that would be the main
>> stumbling block to separating the core development framework.
>
Most of our clients makes use of several differe
Sorry for the top post :/
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
I have some clients who use the POS alone
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Christopher Snow wrote:
It would be interesting to know how many of the committers for ofbiz
that DON'T use ofbiz primarily for ecommerce. I think that would be the
mai
Hi all,
in case you waited for my 0.02 EUR :
I tend to agree with Jacques: OFBiz is a ERP framework (with loads of
ecommerce capabilites, I agree, but think of all the queries 1-2 months ago
on this list about configuring for manufacturing workflow etc.)
I do miss more comments and advancement in
Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Nov 13, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
This is my understanding of the conflict in interest:
1) Ofbiz as an ecommerce focused application with ERP that is
developed on top of unstable trunk and kept updated via svn and
pa
From: "Carsten Schinzer"
[snip]
I would be very much in favour of a bi-annual release schedule, say a spring
and an autumn release. (I think that's not a surprise to anyone). And I
think that's feasible, wouldn't it?
Actually OFBiz is big, and it's take time to backport to 2+ releases for each
This issue is beyond dead. Can we please move on?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 13, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jacopo,
>>>
>>> This is my understanding of the conflict in interest:
>>>
>>> 1) Ofbiz as an ecomm
Le 13/11/2009 08:42, jonatan soto a écrit :
It would be a good idea a full integration of Maven2 on Ofbiz? it is already
considered/done? I think it may be helpful to control the release mechanism
and also gives the ability to separate everything in modules as Harmet
said.
For example, Ofbiz co
On Nov 22, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
>
>
> Le 13/11/2009 08:42, jonatan soto a écrit :
>> It would be a good idea a full integration of Maven2 on Ofbiz? it is already
>> considered/done? I think it may be helpful to control the release mechanism
>> and also gives the ability t
Le 22/11/2009 11:59, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Nov 22, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
At Nereide, we are developping an add-on manager, which gives the possibility
to extend OFBiz with addons. It is made to add quickly features to an OFBiz
instance. The goal is also to
This seems like a great improvement Erwan - is this something that
will be making it's way into OFBiz proper or something you guys are
working on just in the derivative? No stress, just wondering as it
seems like it has great potential.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://ww
Le 23/11/2009 05:51, Tim Ruppert a écrit :
This seems like a great improvement Erwan - is this something that will
be making it's way into OFBiz proper or something you guys are working
on just in the derivative? No stress, just wondering as it seems like it
has great potential.
Thanks ! We ar
Awesome - great news Erwan and looking forward to it.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 23, 2009, at 1:30 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 23/11/2009 05:51, Tim Ruppert a écrit :
This seems like a great improvement Er
Carsten,
Thank you for a well thought out email, and for the specific
recommendations you included. Without those sorts of things discussion
isn't really possible.
That said, I think in general you confusing a centrally planned and
manage organization with an all volunteer community. I'l
Hi Carsten,
On Nov 12, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
> Well, regarding participation, we just had an excellent Talk about
> participating in open source - and guess what even more detailed: on ASF -
> projects here at W-JAX 2009 in Munich.
>
> It was especially of interest, since it
Anyone can certainly create a forked project at any time. Some have
even done so, with varying levels of success. BTW, if you look at the
actual experiences of projects that have forked from OFBiz, be careful
to recognize what is marketing material intended to attract users, and
what repr
99 matches
Mail list logo
