To answer your question: yes, we use Ofbiz trunk as the foundation of the
project so everything fix or enhancement that we do in Ofbiz will be
committed back by Bilgin, our ASF committor on the project.
The solution is tailored to Real Estate Management and we prefer to manage
that seperately. I
Hello,
When will you give us the url for the preview?
Heidi
Olagos bvba
2009/12/3 Jeroen van der Wal jvander...@stromboli.it
To answer your question: yes, we use Ofbiz trunk as the foundation of the
project so everything fix or enhancement that we do in Ofbiz will be
committed back by
Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
I don't think Ofbiz benefits by adding industry specifc
features; keeping the existing codebase stable and testable already requires
a lot of effort from the community. I personally would like a clearer
separtion between the Framework, Core modules and Add-ons but that
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com wrote:
Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
I don't think Ofbiz benefits by adding industry specifc
features; keeping the existing codebase stable and testable already
requires
a lot of effort from the community. I personally would like a
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
I don't think Ofbiz benefits by adding industry specifc
features; keeping the existing codebase stable and testable already requires
a lot of effort from the community. I personally would like a clearer
separtion between the
Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com wrote:
Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
I don't think Ofbiz benefits by adding industry specifc
features; keeping the existing codebase stable and testable already
requires
a lot of effort from the community. I
I don't think it is realistic to expect anyone to contribute a quality
add-on back to the project and maintain it. All of us that work (or
have worked) on the project do so because it contributes financially
to us in other ways.
If someone was to create a commercially viable add-on, then I think
Al,
It appears you're arguing against the success of companies like Red Hat,
JBoss, and Novell - who all maintain open source software and offer it
for free.
If I developed a vertical application, I wouldn't hesitate to contribute
it back to the project. Why should I pay a staff of
From: Jeroen van der Wal jvander...@stromboli.it
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com wrote:
Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
I don't think Ofbiz benefits by adding industry specifc
features; keeping the existing codebase stable and testable already
requires
a lot of
From: Al Byers bye...@automationgroups.com
I don't think it is realistic to expect anyone to contribute a quality
add-on back to the project and maintain it. All of us that work (or
have worked) on the project do so because it contributes financially
to us in other ways.
If someone was to
Adrian,
I think you have a valid point. But the companies that you named are
just support companies and that has a different financial model than
companies that profit from IP. You have to make a choice between
making money via the support mode or the IP mode. If you choose the IP
mode, then you
Jeroen,
AssetMaint application was developed to support maintenance of fleet or other
kind of machines and is still used by more then two parties (Adrian's employer
and my previous employer) in community for sure.
I also have started (not made lot of progress yet because of time constraint)
to
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Al,
It appears you're arguing against the success of companies like Red Hat,
JBoss, and Novell - who all maintain open source software and offer it
for free.
If I developed a vertical application, I wouldn't hesitate to contribute
it back to the
Jeroen,
Do you plan to contribute your enhancements back to project?
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/apache-ofbiz-blog/ofbiz-tutorial-custom-components-in-ofbiz/
On Nov 29, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
We've developed a quite
Jeroen,
I do interested in previewing your solution.
Regards,
Anousak
On 11 30, 2009 8:00 AM, Jeroen van der Wal jer...@stromboli.it wrote:
We've developed a quite sophisticated solution for managing (commercial)
properties on top of Ofbiz. It will be available in Q1 2010 but if anybody
is
...@stromboli.it
Subject: Ofbiz for Real Estate Management
To: user user@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Monday, 30 November, 2009, 0:59
We've developed a quite sophisticated
solution for managing (commercial)
properties on top of Ofbiz. It will be available in Q1 2010
but if anybody
is interested
such a
preview?
--- On Mon, 30/11/09, Jeroen van der Wal jer...@stromboli.it wrote:
From: Jeroen van der Wal jer...@stromboli.it
Subject: Ofbiz for Real Estate Management
To: user user@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Monday, 30 November, 2009, 0:59
We've developed a quite sophisticated
solution
such a
preview?
--- On Mon, 30/11/09, Jeroen van der Wal jer...@stromboli.it wrote:
From: Jeroen van der Wal jer...@stromboli.it
Subject: Ofbiz for Real Estate Management
To: user user@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Monday, 30 November, 2009, 0:59
We've developed a quite
We've developed a quite sophisticated solution for managing (commercial)
properties on top of Ofbiz. It will be available in Q1 2010 but if anybody
is interested I'm happy to give preview. Some features:
Asset Management
- Show your assets in a tree view with unlimited levels (complex, building,
Hi that will be nice. Thought of that sometime ago. How do I get such a preview?
--- On Mon, 30/11/09, Jeroen van der Wal jer...@stromboli.it wrote:
From: Jeroen van der Wal jer...@stromboli.it
Subject: Ofbiz for Real Estate Management
To: user user@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Monday, 30 November
20 matches
Mail list logo
