Re: What am I missing? /etc/init.d type of start

I only commented because it took me a while to get a init.d startup to work, and as soon as I finished it, i upgraded my fedora box and now everything is systemd. Some people don't like the all powerful systemd, but it is taking over nonetheless, much like selinux Chris On Jul 27, 2016 1:20 PM,

Re: What am I missing? /etc/init.d type of start

Welp... I guess that's the next step. On 07/27/2016 12:39 AM, Chris Clark wrote: The real question is why you aren't on systemd by now Chris On Jul 26, 2016 9:33 PM, "Craig Parker" wrote: Pierre -- it's up and running. Thanks a bunch. I need to get POS running too, but

Re: What am I missing? /etc/init.d type of start

The real question is why you aren't on systemd by now Chris On Jul 26, 2016 9:33 PM, "Craig Parker" wrote: > Pierre -- it's up and running. Thanks a bunch. I need to get POS running > too, but I'll take a break and just learn what I've got for the moment > > On 07/22/2016

Re: What am I missing? /etc/init.d type of start

Hi Craig, I have found that the script for Ubuntu is of a lesser quality than the one for Debian, so that is what I have been using for various environments as a starting point. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions

What am I missing? /etc/init.d type of start

I set this down because I couldn't get it running, but I'm picking it back up. Still in the "using the demo" stage,a nd while I can start fine with ./ant start from the ofbiz directory, I can't seem to get it started with an /etc/init.d/ofbiz script. I've tried a couple things, but the latest