Re: splitup of ebay component.

2010-01-29 Thread Florin Popa
Did it as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3435 Please contribute and attach it to an Jira issue! perhaps we can include it in the Ofbiz distribution? Did you have a lokk what is recently added? Regards, hans On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 09:45 +0200, Florin Popa wrote: Hi, For our

Re: splitup of ebay component.

2010-01-29 Thread Hans Bakker
Excellent thanks we will have a look at it. On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:40 +0200, Florin Popa wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3435 -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates

Re: splitup of ebay component.

2010-01-29 Thread BJ Freeman
when I added to Ebay, I used generic calls that other ofbiz application could hook into. then at a lower level added my functionality. By keeping the services at the ofbiz level the same don't have to keep changing other application, unless they want to use the new functionality. the also works

splitup of ebay component.

2010-01-28 Thread Hans Bakker
Hi follow OFBiz users. as you have seen at the latest commits we have extended the ebay component by using the Ebay API which allows an ofbiz user to (almost) maintain all Ebay functions within OFBiz. Up to now there was no overlap between the existing XML functions and the new API functions,

Re: splitup of ebay component.

2010-01-28 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Hans, Is there any reason that you know of for us to retain the XML interface at all? If the API is better then shouldn't we just use it alone? If we end up keeping both we might need better names, XML vs. API doesn't mean much (I mean the XML interface is also an API) or is this how eBay

Re: splitup of ebay component.

2010-01-28 Thread Florin Popa
Hi, For our project we developed already most of the Ebay related functionalities based on EbayAPI. Indeed there are few particular things like the way we keep track of the products sent to ebay as well as the set of attributes which could be published along with a product. If anyone

Re: splitup of ebay component.

2010-01-28 Thread Hans Bakker
Yes Scott I agree with you the names are not good. We do think however we need both components. For simple stores the current ebay component can still be interesting. The main difference is in the functionality, the new component is much more advanced so the name: Ebay Advanced or Ebay

Re: splitup of ebay component.

2010-01-28 Thread Hans Bakker
Please contribute and attach it to an Jira issue! perhaps we can include it in the Ofbiz distribution? Did you have a lokk what is recently added? Regards, hans On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 09:45 +0200, Florin Popa wrote: Hi, For our project we developed already most of the Ebay related

Re: splitup of ebay component.

2010-01-28 Thread Hans Bakker
Another suggested name: Ebay Store On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 21:50 -0700, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Hans, Is there any reason that you know of for us to retain the XML interface at all? If the API is better then shouldn't we just use it alone? If we end up keeping both we might need better