FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe
the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor
wrote:
> Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the 1.0
> branch going in light of this hard de
That's my understanding as well.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe
> the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for
Until the CDH distro moves off of 1.0, we'll likely want to continue
releasing Phoenix on top of it (even if there are no further HBase 1.0
releases). That's assuming our CDH Phoenix users want the new features and
bug fixes we're developing.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
Agreed. Until Cloudera moves CDH off Hbase 1.0, Phoenix should continue to
support it.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:31 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> Until the CDH distro moves off of 1.0, we'll likely want to continue
> releasing Phoenix on top of it (even if there are no further HBase 1.0
> releases)
Shouldn't be a big challenge, the friction for porting back patches from a
1.1 based tree to a 1.0 based tree will be low. The exception will be
anything touching Region/HRegion but those differences can be mostly
handled with simple substitution.
For CDH users, note there's also
https://github.co
+user list
Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that we
have HBase 1.1 support.
Thanks,
James
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it
> depends on where the vendors are going, if the
Along the same lines as HBase, it seems fine to discontinue old code lines
until such point as there is someone willing to maintain a given line - a
new RM. Essentially, its the same as an RM stepping down from managing a
release and no releases happening until someone cares enough to make a new
on
We use HDP at TrueCar. Currently, it ships with HBase1.1
And previous version of HDP shipped with HBase0.98.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:53 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> +user list
>
> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that we
> have HBase 1.1 support.
>
> Thanks,
> Jame
We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0.
I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were no
1.0 support.
James
On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote:
+user list
Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that
we have HBase 1.1 support.
Thanks,
Ja
Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if
HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community.
Anirudha
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather
wrote:
> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0.
>
> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were
Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the 1.0
branch going in light of this hard dependency you have.
James
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna wrote:
> Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if
> HBase-1.0 support is stop
11 matches
Mail list logo
