That's pretty weird. It looks ok as far as I can tell.
I would also think that each component would have its own instance of
the validator.
Maybe there's something strange in your validator code? Are you
maintaining any kind of static state?
On 3/29/07, Jason Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary, I see this as a tomahawk bug. I'm pretty sure I looked at this
a couple weeks ago and noticed that the renderer was being set inside
the JSP tag handler rather than in the component. Seems like setting
it from the taghandler is the wrong approach. Breaks anything other
than the jsp
] wrote:
From: Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary, I see this as a tomahawk bug. I'm pretty sure I looked at this
a couple weeks ago and noticed that the renderer was being set inside
the JSP tag handler rather than in the component. Seems like setting
it from the taghandler is the wrong
I've opened http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-942 on this.
On 3/27/07, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary, I see this as a tomahawk bug. I'm pretty sure I looked at this
a couple weeks ago and noticed that the renderer was being
... suppose we are required to validate (
Form1.fieldA,Form1.fieldB,Form2.fieldC) when comboX submitted and (
Form1.fieldD,Form2.fieldE) when a buttonY submitted...
this means, it's needed, for our project, to validate grouped fields
independent from their forms...
hasan..
On 3/19/07, Mike
Tomahawk sandbox subForm (and probably others like Trinidad's subForm)
will allow you to do validation grouping like you've specified below.
On 3/19/07, Hasan Turksoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like your doing some creating stuff with the validator.
Yes, i've customized so many parts at
I believe that MyFaces 1.1.1 had duplicate id issues. I know that
was the situation with facelets. I'd recommend upgrading MyFaces
core.
On 3/1/07, Ryan Wynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darn, I thought we had this one covered for all the releases but I must not
have tested again with
Yeah, none of the listed JSF validators will be executed if the input
component has an empty (or null) value.
The only easy way to do this is with the required attribute on the
input component.
One hard way of doing this is shown at the bottom of this page:
Toplink is now an oracle product.
Maybe somewhere wherever adffaces can be found?
On 9/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I was planning on importing the shal-clay-jpa project into Eclipse through mvn
eclipse:eclipse. However it stops on an unresolved dependency:
On 9/22/06, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've not hooked this into a web app yet. Please share any thoughts/ideas you
might have on this project.
If you're talking about Toplink, I last evaluated it a couple years
ago. Buggy closed-source was the evaluation at that time.
10 matches
Mail list logo
