Craig,
Do you still think we can have this in a 1.0.4 release before Apache
Con? I'm thinking this is 100% for the stable release and a stable
release is a must have for Apache Con.
Sean
ps. Please post to the dev list once the wiki goes up. I tend to
gloss over most of the wiki messages in
I suggest when it comes time to vote we pick our top 5 and rank order
them. We can give 5 points to the first choice, 4 points to the
second, etc. The top 5 point getters could then be announced and we
could vote based on those.
I'm assuming the decision will be a committer vote but do we want
Yup. I am working on a complete petstore application for the sandbox.
It uses facelets (and many other technologies) along with Shale. I'm
just working out a couple of Hibernate bugs before I do the initial
checkin.
So far I am using Shale's Spring and ViewController stuff with
facelets. The
So what features are you trying to avoid? It sounds like you're
talking about the view controller stuff but I can't be sure. I can't
think of any problems Shale would cause for you if you used all of the
add on stuff in faces-config.xml. For instance, if you don't want the
ViewController
Couldn't you just use JMock for those?
Sean
On 7/20/06, Sreedevi Aswath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It would be great if there could be a mock up for the JSF components too.
That way, the unit tests for managed beans would be easier whenever there
is a valuebinding
involved.
