a new version of the TilesViewHandler compatible with 2.0.5 of
standalone tiles?
I tried the current one with 2.0.5 and got no class def found
exceptions.
Shawn
-Message Disclaimer-
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which
Since the release of a GA version of Standalone Tiles when can we expect
a new version of the TilesViewHandler compatible with 2.0.5 of
standalone tiles?
I tried the current one with 2.0.5 and got no class def found
exceptions.
Shawn
-Message Disclaimer-
This e-mail message
According to the Documentation for the shale-tiles TilesViewHandler:
* Strips off the view ID's suffix (eg: /tiles/test.jsp becomes
/tiles/test)
* Searches for a tile with the resulting name, with or without the
leading slash (eg: /tiles/test or tiles/test)
I was not getting
-
From: Dick Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:37 AM
To: user@shale.apache.org
Subject: RE: TilesViewHandler
Standalone Tiles works for me.
In tiles.xml I use definitions like definition name=/myDef ...
My navigation rules are like from-view-id/myDef.jsp/from-view-id
7:48 AM
To: user@shale.apache.org
Subject: RE: TilesViewHandler
I'm sure if I renamed my tiles to have the slash at the beginning of
their names that it would work as well. My confusion is over the
explicit statement that it will look for a tile both with and without
the leading slash
On Aug 29, 2006, at 8:13 AM, Dick Starr wrote:
When I saw that the navigation rule required a slash, I went with a
slash on the tiles defs. Per Kito's book (p 132), the view-id must
always start with a slash - but I don't know why.
Wow, I didn't know that. Sounds kinda restrictive. Does
to be the case.
It is no longer the case, and the latest documentation has been updated to
reflect that.
david
JB
-Original Message-
From: Dick Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:37 AM
To: user@shale.apache.org
Subject: RE: TilesViewHandler
Standalone
