>Do I need a deployment plan? I think misdirecting to Eclipse
> or JDeveloper is not the point. I can see plenty of documentation
> for building. All I want to do at this point is install the out of the
> box shale-clay-usecases.war in a standalone OC4J...and it
> isn't working.
I sent you
That was for JDeveloper
> >
> >See the tutorials on the Shale Wiki
> >
> >Hermod
> >
> >
> >-Opprinnelig melding-
> >Fra: John Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sendt: 11. april 2007 23:00
> >Til: user@shale.apache.org
> >Emne: Re: stac
Hi
You do not need to do anything when using Eclipse - That was for JDeveloper
See the tutorials on the Shale Wiki
Hermod
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: John Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. april 2007 23:00
Til: user@shale.apache.org
Emne: Re: stack traces from shale-clay-u
b folder?
John
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary VanMatre)
Subject Re: stack traces from shale-clay-usecases
Date Sat, 03 Feb 2007 05:10:58 GMT
I was able to run the shale-clay-usecases in 10g (10.1.3.1.1) from
JDeveloper Studio 10.1.3.2
but I had to make a few minor
ib folder?
John
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary VanMatre)
Subject Re: stack traces from shale-clay-usecases
Date Sat, 03 Feb 2007 05:10:58 GMT
I was able to run the shale-clay-usecases in 10g (10.1.3.1.1) from
JDeveloper Studio 10.1.3.2
but I had to make a few minor changes.
>>On 2/2/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I was able to run the shale-clay-usecases in 10g (10.1.3.1.1) from
>> JDeveloper Studio 10.1.3.2 but I had to make a few minor changes.
>>
>> For some reason, JDeveloper doesn't like that the shale-core and
>> shale-validator jars have TLD
On 2/3/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ignore the previous empty response -- that's what you get when you pet a cat
who is pawing your mouse at that moment :-).
LOL - my cat sometimes walks accross my keyboard, fortunately no
strange messages have resulted to date, but its going
On 2/2/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was able to run the shale-clay-usecases in 10g (10.1.3.1.1) from
JDeveloper Studio 10.1.3.2 but I had to make a few minor changes.
For some reason, JDeveloper doesn't like that the shale-core and
shale-validator jars have TLD files with the
On 2/2/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was able to run the shale-clay-usecases in 10g (10.1.3.1.1) from
JDeveloper Studio 10.1.3.2 but I had to make a few minor changes.
For some reason, JDeveloper doesn't like that the shale-core and
shale-validator jars have TLD files with the
I was able to run the shale-clay-usecases in 10g (10.1.3.1.1) from JDeveloper
Studio 10.1.3.2 but I had to make a few minor changes.
For some reason, JDeveloper doesn't like that the shale-core and
shale-validator jars have TLD files with the name "taglib.tld"? I renamed the
TLD's and it was ha
I got a couple of stacktraces from the shale-clay-usecases using OC4J
10.1.3.1 (supposedly
supports J2EE 1.4). I deployed the shale-clay-usecases.war and
tried to use the rolodex use
cases. None of the rolodex cases work, although the first use case
page does work. Here are
the 2 different kin
11 matches
Mail list logo
