Thanks Nathan.
Will go with assumption that if latency at spout is much higher than
combined latencies at rest of bolts, then the additional latencies at spout
are due to messages piling on out bound queue..
Regards
Kashyap
On Jul 29, 2015 1:49 PM, "Nathan Leung" wrote:
> Roughly speaking (disre
Roughly speaking (disregarding any network latencies and any benefits from
having multiple threads servicing the output queues vs having 1), having 1
spout with high max pending should be similar to many spouts with low max
pending. Your total number of tuples pending in the topology is the same
e
Hi,
I am using storm 0.8.2 , trident DRPC for my log processing.
We have a very heavy task and trying to do it with drpc.
Input to drpc is a file name , output is usually 1GB string data.
Problem : DRPC is not assigning task to all workers.
Currently running 5 nodes.Other 4 nodes using given conf
Nathan,
So the following is true? -
Spout Latency = (Time spent output queues *[A]*)+(time difference between
emit from NextTuple and time spent in acking *[B]*)
So does it mean that if the complete latency at spout level is high but the
bolts have very low latencies, then instead of increasing th
Thank you Taylor and Grant for your replies.
I will try the approaches suggested by both of you.
Richards Peter.
1 second is too short. Spout latency includes time spent in the output
queue from the spout (increasing max spout pending potentially increases
your end-to-end latency, depending on whether you have anything buffered in
the spout output queues).
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Kashyap Mhaisekar
Thanks Nathan. But in this case how should the Spout Latency be
interpreted. In the same example you quoted above -
spout a -> bolt b (emits 10 tuples per msg) -> bolt c
I see the process latency and execute latencies under 5 ms both for B and
C. While the spout is at 1500ms. The Bolts dont don an
No. You need to consider your system more carefully. As a trivial
example, imagine you have spout a -> bolt b -> bolt c, with bolt b
splitting tuple into 10 tuples. Each component has 1 task. If each
component takes 1ms, your latency will not be the sum of the per bolt
latency because of your f
Hi Richards,
The transitive dependencies that are now included in the storm-core jar file
have their package names “relocated” so users can include their own versions of
those dependencies without encountering dependency conflicts.
The best practice is to include your own version of those depen
Thanks Nathan.
If I see the complete latency at spout is greater than the process
latencies of all bolts put together, does it mean that the ACKERS are a
problem and need to be increased?
thanks
kashyap
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Nathan Leung wrote:
> The count is tracked from each spout
I’d leave storm/lib vanilla and package the higher versions of those libs with
your topology jar using maven shade to relocate the necessary packages to avoid
conflict. Here is an example from a storm topology that relocates guava
(com.google.common).
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-s
Hi,
I was using storm-0.8.2 so far in my project. I am starting to evaluate
storm-0.9.*. I found a difference in the way storm-core(0.9.4)
/storm(0.8.2) jar has been packaged. I am not an expert in this packaging
concept. So I thought of taking some advice from the experts.
In storm 0.8.* jar, I
Hi Everyone,
For a Storm cluster running multiple topologies, what is the recommended
scheduler--Mesos or the Isolation Scheduler?
The reasons I ask are per this post back in 2013:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/storm-user/GQEH-6x6oyI and the fact
we are seeing some issues where a partic
storm use logback,so you do not need to restart storm。
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:48:05 +0200
> From: i...@lambdoop.com
> To: user@storm.apache.org
> Subject: Unsuscribe
>
> Unsuscribe
>
> - Mensaje original -
> De: "张炜"
> Para: user@storm.apache.org
> Enviados: Jueves, 2 de Julio 20
Did you package all your classes correctly in your jar file that is
submitted to Nimbus?
-Matthias
On 07/29/2015 09:39 AM, Vamsikrishna Vinjam wrote:
> i can run the topologies which are in storm examples..but i can the
> topologies which i have written if i try to run them i getting error like
>
i can run the topologies which are in storm examples..but i can the
topologies which i have written if i try to run them i getting error like
"could not find or load class"
16 matches
Mail list logo