Soon we will be pushing some interesting additions to storm, using AWS S3 and
storm deployment into Kubernetes cluster.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, February 3, 2023, 12:01 PM, Sebastian Nagel
wrote:
Hello everybody,
> +1 for keeping Apache Storm maintained and +1 for
Hello everybody,
> +1 for keeping Apache Storm maintained and +1 for Taylor as PMC from me as
> well.
+1 from me as well (non-binding vote)
At Common Crawl we have a Storm instance (crawling news sites using
Stormcrawler) running since more than six years. Only with short interrupts
to
+1 for keeping Apache Storm maintained and +1 for Taylor as PMC from me as well.
Thanks—Bipin Prasad
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, February 3, 2023, 10:32 AM, Jonas Krauss wrote:
+1 for keeping Apache Storm maintained and +1 for Taylor as PMC!
Am Fr., 3. Feb. 2023 um 14:58 Uhr
+1 for keeping Apache Storm maintained and +1 for Taylor as PMC!
Am Fr., 3. Feb. 2023 um 14:58 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
avermeerber...@gmail.com>:
> +1 for whatever makes Apache Storm to be maintained as long as
> possible, including my time if needed !
>
> Alexandre
>
> Le ven. 3
+1 for whatever makes Apache Storm to be maintained as long as
possible, including my time if needed !
Alexandre
Le ven. 3 févr. 2023 à 14:54, Richard Zowalla a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am also +1 for Taylor as PMC and please count me in as well (my first
> comment was a bit vague about it).
>
Hi all,
I am also +1 for Taylor as PMC and please count me in as well (my first
comment was a bit vague about it).
Looks like, that the discussion is going well. We know see a lot of
involvement ;-) (didn't see that for years on this list!).
Gruß
Richard
Am Freitag, dem 03.02.2023 um 13:20
It might be possible to enable GitHub discussions (like Airflow did for
example) to have a plattform for Q and user community, which isn't
the traditional ASF way of doing. Of course, dev discussion still need
to be on the list ;)
Am Freitag, dem 03.02.2023 um 15:41 +0200 schrieb Mykyta
It's so sad that Storm probably will be moved to the attic. Honestly, we
have been using this great system on our prod for a few years but I face
similar problems people mentioned here as well. It looks like the community
is either non-active or very low, starting from searching for any info
about
Hi,
I'd be happy to get involved. I haven't delved deep into Storm's code but
have been using it for years and my project StormCrawler relies heavily on
it. I have been a committer on several Apache projects but not been active
in any of them for a while.
I know that there are loads of
I agree with Taylor, and suggest Taylor as the new PMC chair (he is the
former Storm PMC chair, has rich experience in community operation and
management).
Rui Abreu 于2023年2月3日周五 08:21写道：
> Storm is a very successful project, even before the major re-write that
> happened on version 2.x.
> The
Storm is a very successful project, even before the major re-write that
happened on version 2.x.
The community has been slowing down over the last couple of years, but
perhaps that is a reflection of the maturity level of the project, where
there are no major bugs or feature requests. So I like to
An anecdote that might be applicable:
Look at version controls over the last few decades:
CVS —> Apache Subersion —> Git
Each transition was a major improvement.
That may lead you believe that Subversion is dead and long gone. And you would
be wrong.
Subversion is still alive because
IMO, there are tow scenarios:
1. Storm is in dead. No one uses it anymore, and no one needs security patches,
etc.
2. Storm is in maintenance mode. While new features may not be added, there are
enough contributors left tp at least address any security concerns.
Wether we pursue the attic o
One side note looking to see what folks are migrating or moved to if not
using Storm actively. Any cloud native DAG platform to recommend?
-Sunil
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 6:12 PM Stephen Powis via user
wrote:
> Ah Yea, also not opposed to the move to the attic if it's determined to be
> most
Ah Yea, also not opposed to the move to the attic if it's determined to be
most appropriate, but I had a similar experience as Richard where I
submitted some PRs, asked for comments/thoughts/review, and even offered to
take over ownership of one of the sub modules and got no responses.
Perhaps I
Hi Aaron,
I am CC the users@ list as they weren't contained in the initial
proposal. Perhaps, there are people or institutions in the wild, who
want to volunteer or give it a try (still at the ASF level).
Of course it shouldn't prevent a VOTE for moving to the attic, but an
additional try to
16 matches
Mail list logo
