Re: Simple question about shale-clay responding with the raw jsp instead of html

tags in the jsp page. They all have the same attributes (action etc), and they all work (submit to the page in "action" attribute, which then renders perfectly). When I click on the link produced by clay - I get the raw createProject.jsp text in the source code of the rendered html

Re: Simple question about shale-clay responding with the raw jsp instead of html

rly instantiated when accessed in a a pure jsf context (using jsf commandLink elements with the same parameters), so I assume that all of the mappings in web.xml etc are OK. Thanks. Z. On 1/25/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >From: xzuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Simple question about shale-clay responding with the raw jsp instead of html

Hello, I just started implementing my shale-clay application (looking at rolodex example) and upon creating a command link in my view controller, I can see the link on the html page, but when I click it, the next page is blank and the source code shows only the jsp code of one of the subviews of t

Re: [OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality

On 1/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/12/06, David G. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Since no one else has answered, I'll give this a try: > > > > JSF is the base for everything you asked about. Only AFTER you are > > comfortable with JSF implementation (the

[OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality

Hello, I am reading discussions about the above three frameworks with one goal in mind, to find out whether JSF, Shale and Facelets are trully orthogonal. That is, if I go along any path, will be able to add any other framework lateron? How hard it is? What features of the frameworks are interlapp