On 5/2/05, Jason Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a quick note/question about Craig's code below:
>
> This line
>
> ${category.label}
>
> will output the value with not xml filtering, so some values will cause
> incorrect xml to be generated.
>
> You should use tag to filter the <,>,
Just a quick note/question about Craig's code below:
This line
${category.label}
will output the value with not xml filtering, so some values will cause
incorrect xml to be generated.
You should use tag to filter the <,>,',", and & characters to
output <, >, ', ", and &
and the same for
Woodchuck wrote:
JSTL is da bomb! :)
Does this mean... we can drop it?
Eh, it's Friday, whaddya want.
Seriously, I hate all that typing-JSP 2.0 may save my wrists.
Dave "What do you mean, Monday?" Newton
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On 5/2/05, Woodchuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JSTL is da bomb! :)
Indeed it is. If you actually need to create XML in a response to an
XmlHttpRequest call from an Ajax client side gadget :-), here's an
approach using a JSP 2.0 page (in xml syntax) that uses JSTL to
iterate over a result set
JSTL is da bomb! :)
--- Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dakota Jack wrote the following on 5/2/2005 4:01 PM:
> >
> > The other aspect that is not discussed above is the removal of the
> > complexity from the "page". This is where JSP, Taglibs, etc., come
> > into the picture. And, I
5 matches
Mail list logo
