No, I am using the BeanUtils.copyProperties(target, orig);
-Original Message-
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 12:57 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ot] utility to verify if an Object implements all methods
from Interface?
Mick
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Hey, this is 2005, almost 2006, any solution must have:
* At least 50 EJBs
* Be based on some framework that can't be comprehended without
$10,000 worth of development tools
* A completely superfluous persistence framework
* At least 25 XML config files
* 75 UML diagr
Hey, this is 2005, almost 2006, any solution must have:
* At least 50 EJBs
* Be based on some framework that can't be comprehended without $10,000
worth of development tools
* A completely superfluous persistence framework
* At least 25 XML config files
* 75 UML diagrams
* A document talking ab
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Yeah, I don't know why I thought there was more to it 20 minutes ago, that
looks right to me too now.
Oh, come on. There's gotta me an XML config file in there SOMEWHERE!
Dave
-
To unsubscribe,
Yeah, I don't know why I thought there was more to it 20 minutes ago, that
looks right to me too now.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, October 28, 2005 4:13 pm, Ric
I think the subclassing suggestion is the easiest.
public class subclass extends superclass implements
theInterface {
// empty class declaration
}
-Richard
--- "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's funny, I started writing up an example with a
> subclass and an
> implemente
It's funny, I started writing up an example with a subclass and an
implemented interface and cloning and so on and so forth and as I got near
the end I said "wait, this is stupid, just loop through with reflection as
I and others suggested yesterday!"... Sometimes the "brute force" method
really *i
Mick Knutson wrote:
Because I would have to modify generated code to do that. And it only
implements serializable. Nothing else.
And you can't subclass it and have the subclass implement the interface?
In any case, just loop through w/ reflection and check.
I'm still confused though; are
an Object implements all methods
from Interface?
Interesting... why can't you implement the interface? Just curious.
Does it implement any other interfaces to build up the method list? If
so, you could just do a serious of instanceof's against all the
interfaces it implements. Alt
Mick,
You could write a wrapper object that wraps (extends)
the generated object and implements the interface. If
the extended object does not have all of the methods
defined in the interface, you will get a compile
error.
-Richard
--- Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some genera
I think you could use the java.lang.reflect package classes:
Object obj = new Object();
Method[] methods = obj.getClass.getMethods();
Create another test object that does implement all of the interfaces,
and then compare the methods array to the array created by the test
object's .getClass.getMet
Interesting... why can't you implement the interface? Just curious.
Does it implement any other interfaces to build up the method list? If
so, you could just do a serious of instanceof's against all the
interfaces it implements. Alternatively, you can use reflection to get
a list of the met
I have some generated Objects that I CAN"T make implement my given
interface, but I would like to run a test at startup time, if the Object
has all the methods it is suppose to have?
"MMS " made the following annotations.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
