Re: 2.1.6 mystery

Thanks Musachy -- I really appreciate you pointing this out. I will review the changes to see if it would be cheaper to roll back to 2.1.2. This sort of change that breaks an application is troubling. Peace, Scott On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > I would say that th

Re: 2.1.6 mystery

I would say that this change: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/components/ActionComponent.java?r1=651946&r2=668602 broke that for you(you were using something that was actually broken). You can grab the value in your action, and make it avail

Re: 2.1.6 mystery

Hey brother -- Actually, I believe the problem is with the action call itself When this action is invoked, my CmsAction identifies the appropriate action name using getContext().getActionInvocation().getInvocationContext().getName(); which is now ALWAYS returning the name that was associated

Re: 2.1.6 mystery

What does print? musachy On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:38 PM, wrote: > Does anyone have a clue why > > > > is working differently between 2.1.2 and 2.1.6? I have looked many places > and cannot see the usage pointed out anywhere. Is > this

Re: 2.1.6 mystery

Does anyone have a clue why is working differently between 2.1.2 and 2.1.6? I have looked many places and cannot see the usage pointed out anywhere. Is thisthe only hot sheet for differences? I'd rather not roll back if it's only a s

2.1.6 mystery

ext: http://www.nabble.com/2.1.6-mystery-tp21938203p21938203.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-ma