On 5/4/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, sorry, never did get around to reading it... I meant to, but the
book is all I've had time for since pretty much January.
Yeah, yeah, yeah ;-)
I actually
really can't wait to be done with it, at least the initial writing.
Will it b
No, sorry, never did get around to reading it... I meant to, but the
book is all I've had time for since pretty much January. I actually
really can't wait to be done with it, at least the initial writing.
There's so many things I'd like to be working on right now! The current
project, while b
My article is out:
http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2006/05/04/almost-portlets.html
I bet you haven't read the draft that I've sent you :-) How's your
book going? This [EMAIL PROTECTED] article took me almost a month. I updated it
15 times or so. The book... oh, this should be really tough :)
On Thu, May 4, 2006 3:56 pm, Michael Jouravlev said:
> I see the value of a dispatch action primarily as input (post-,
> submit, accept) action, not as a render (pre-, setup) action. Your
> /showAccont.do mapping is a render action, therefore it will likely
> not be covered by dispatch action.
>
>
On 5/4/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 4, 2006 1:59 pm, Michael Jouravlev said:
> Code-wise:
>
> one action class per one logical web resource seems more natural to
> me. Say, Employee. I would have one EmployeeForm, one EmployeeAction
> and several JSP pages for diff
Didn't want to hijack a thread, so...
On Thu, May 4, 2006 2:21 pm, Dave Newton said:
> Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>> I.e., you want /showAccount.do accessible to the AccountManager and
>> Customer roles, but you only want /updateAccount.do accessible to the
>> AccountManager role? As I understand i
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> I.e., you want /showAccount.do accessible to the AccountManager and Customer
> roles, but you only want /updateAccount.do accessible to the AccountManager
> role? As I understand it, you would have something like /accountResource.do,
> and dispatch to a particular met
On Thu, May 4, 2006 1:59 pm, Michael Jouravlev said:
> Code-wise:
>
> one action class per one logical web resource seems more natural to
> me. Say, Employee. I would have one EmployeeForm, one EmployeeAction
> and several JSP pages for different modes. All compact and observable
> with as little s
Code-wise:
one action class per one logical web resource seems more natural to
me. Say, Employee. I would have one EmployeeForm, one EmployeeAction
and several JSP pages for different modes. All compact and observable
with as little stuff in config file as possible. But this is just a
preference.
And of course the simple option: separate action :)
It's absolutely true that a Dispath-type action will get rid of all the
if's, and that's good... but you will still be left with a potentially
large Action that performs a number of different (hopefully at least
related!) functions.
Me, I still
Thanks Michael. I will study it.
On 5/5/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dispatching action. Do not use old and crusty DispatchAction.
See these links:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EventActionDispatcher
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/DataEntryForm
Michael.
On 5/4/06, Joey Wats
THe gold rule use interface to encapsulte behaviour
2006/5/4, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dispatching action. Do not use old and crusty DispatchAction.
See these links:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EventActionDispatcher
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/DataEntryForm
Michael.
On 5/4/
Dispatching action. Do not use old and crusty DispatchAction.
See these links:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EventActionDispatcher
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/DataEntryForm
Michael.
On 5/4/06, Joey Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello everybody.
When I was working a big project. I alwa
hello everybody.
When I was working a big project. I always met this problem. coz the
sometimes there are a lot of event need to be handled in a single jsp
page. so programer need to use lots of "if - else" to deal with
different event in Action.execute method. of cause. I think those
codes is
14 matches
Mail list logo