Re: [OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality

2006-01-13 Thread xzuma
On 1/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/12/06, David G. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Since no one else has answered, I'll give this a try: > > > > JSF is the base for everything you asked about. Only AFTER you are > > comfortable with JSF implementation (the

Re: [OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality

2006-01-12 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 1/12/06, David G. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since no one else has answered, I'll give this a try: > > JSF is the base for everything you asked about. Only AFTER you are > comfortable with JSF implementation (the Sun JSF RI > or the MyFaces runtime) would I recommend you try Facele

RE: [OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality

2006-01-12 Thread David G. Friedman
Since no one else has answered, I'll give this a try: JSF is the base for everything you asked about. Only AFTER you are comfortable with JSF implementation (the Sun JSF RI or the MyFaces runtime) would I recommend you try Facelets, Shale or both. Facelets and Shale bring extra functionality on