I'm not sure what you mean. Even though I advised against it, I
explained how to do it.
To be specific, you write an interceptor that scans the incoming
action instance for @EJB annotations. For each annotation, you check
the HttpSession to see if you already have a reference for the
specified c
200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: user@struts.apache.org> Subject: Re: Extending EJBInjection interceptor> >
As i mentioned, i want to avoid doing the lookup every time. Thats why i >
wanted to write that interceptor.> But there doesnt seem to be a good way to
get Beans wi
other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. > Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:18:56 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: user@struts.apache.org> Subject: Re: Extending EJBInjection interceptor> > Thats a pretty good explana
ion to any party other than intended
recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this
transmission. > Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:18:56 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: user@struts.apache.org> Subject: Re: Extending EJBInjection interceptor> >
Tha
Thats a pretty good explanation of how the plugin works
I was going to use this method because it was recommended by another
user on the mailing list.
EJB3 is no necessity, but i want to avoid making jndi lookups in every
action i have. Is there another way to achive that?
Greetings,
Alex
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Alexander Baetz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm currently working on a new Interceptor for EJB Injection on Actions. I
> allready extendet it to work on fields and methods. But since i dont like to
> make my own Annotation type i wanted to use the javax.ejb
any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:16:53 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Re: Extending EJBInjection interceptor
Correct me if i'm wrong but af
Struts Two wrote:
Now seeing that Jeromy is working on a new Interceptor, I wonder if all the servers follow the same lookup pattern.
I'm not working on any interceptors related to this.
For JNDI lookups in S2 in the past I've used the DI framework's features
rather S2.
ie. Both Spring and Gu
the "old" way for JBoss servers is a JNDI lookup, which looks something
like this:
InitialContext initialContext = new InitialContext();
service = initialContext.lookup("");
normaly would be the name used in the @stateless or @statefull
annotation or (if not set) the classname
As it has be
I am currently using my own customized EJB3InjectInterceptor for Websphere
application server (It only injects local beans as I do not use remote in my
application). Now seeing that Jeromy is working on a new Interceptor, I wonder
if all the servers follow the same lookup pattern. I know that in
nature and Sender does not
endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does
not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:16:53 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: R
As i answered to the other mail. I'm not sure. Based on the code i
started with i thought i would have to take care of the instances (and
therefore only hold one for a stateless bean).
I'm not that familiar with EJB injection and lookups. but when i think
about it JNDI has to hold the one instan
Correct me if i'm wrong but afaik beans (with bean-name) are defined via
@stateless and @statefull and @entity
@EJB (in servelett context) does the injection for me.
and this doesnt work with struts.
based on the code from the plugin i thought i would have take care of
the instances. but maybe
> make my own Annotation type i wanted to use the javax.ejb.ejb anotation. But
Maybe it will be better to use @Inject from xwork or something? The
javax.ejb.ejb annotation are used to define EJBs itself not to be used
for injecting them.
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Alexander Baetz wrote:
Hi,
i'm currently working on a new Interceptor for EJB Injection on
Actions. I allready extendet it to work on fields and methods. But
since i dont like to make my own Annotation type i wanted to use the
javax.ejb.ejb anotation. But there is a small problem with that:
15 matches
Mail list logo
