by using tiles, you can define components. A component has a layout and a
few jsp. Actually, the layout itself is a jsp written with tiles tags. A
component can be nested in another component, just like swing. jsp:include
is so simple, and to archive the same goal as tiles, you should do a lot of
e
Raghuveer ha scritto:
hi Greg,
How about performance issue if we go for tiles for application that has 50
jsp's
and that works 24 X 7 with minimum 4 users hitting site at same time ?
What I can say is "try and check it out!" ;-)
Anyway, through the performance perspective, Tiles is not so dif
iling List
Subject: Re: jsp:include or tile
On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Caroline Jen wrote:
> Both the jsp:include tag and the Struts tiles can
> incorporate dynamic resources into the current JSP.
>
> Is there rule of thumb that one is preferable over
> another?
To me, the ben
On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Caroline Jen wrote:
Both the jsp:include tag and the Struts tiles can
incorporate dynamic resources into the current JSP.
Is there rule of thumb that one is preferable over
another?
To me, the benefit of Tiles is the fact that you can configure
reusable page c
4 matches
Mail list logo
