--- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always thought a stack implied levels! Am I
> strange to think maybe the stack search should
> consider this capability?
I think you and Musachy have the right idea with an
#action (or whatever; I'd actually go for something
quicker to type) rather tha
I always thought a stack implied levels! Am I strange to think maybe the stack
search should consider this capability?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... CRAZY!
... STACK!
d.
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel
and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invi
Thanks brother. This is what I wound up doing, but it sure seemed weird!
Why should properties available to a page somehow be made invisible while
looping?
Parent Id: //works fine here!
//GOOFY!
... CRAZY!
Edit
On 7/9/07, cilquirm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the eas
+1 for that :)
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2034
musachy
On 7/9/07, cilquirm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
technically, if you knew the index of where the action was in your value
stack, you could use the index notation.
so you might want to try :
assuming the action is the se
technically, if you knew the index of where the action was in your value
stack, you could use the index notation.
so you might want to try :
assuming the action is the second root down.
but i do agree that'd it be nice to stuff the action into #action.
Chris Pratt wrote:
>
> Seems like you
Seems like you should be able to say
But since there's no getAction in the ActionContext, I doubt that will
work. Maybe it should be added?
(*Chris*)
On 7/9/07, cilquirm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to
reference with a differ
the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to
reference with a different name
and then access it in your loop under the new name.
stanlick wrote:
>
> There is no searching up the stack beyond the top?
>
> On 7/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
There is no searching up the stack beyond the top?
On 7/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But it's a property on the Action!
pushes each iteration onto the value
stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or
model), but each element
--- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But it's a property on the Action!
pushes each iteration onto the value
stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or
model), but each element of the iteration.
d.
__
Have you tryed #yourproperty ?
If that doesn't work, can you send your code ?
Ezequiel.
-Message d'origine-
De : Big Stick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 9 juillet 2007 15:05
À : Struts Users Mailing List
Objet : RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
But it's a propert
But it's a property on the Action!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo
