Hi, Rick. The fact is that this gentleman asked for an opinion that
will influence his business. I think he deserves an honest answer,
even if the "debate" might be old hat to you.
On 9/9/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walton, Kaleb (ISS Southfield) wrote the following on 9/9/2005
> > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:19 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: JSF -> Shale transition
> >
> > Well, have you considered classic struts? Shale is really meant for
> > people who are trying to change an application from JSF t
I should've shut my mouth earlier :).
Kaleb
-Original Message-
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:18 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: JSF -> Shale transition
I prefer to do all my webapps in Assembly running on d
08, 2005 12:44 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JSF -> Shale transition
Moving from Struts to JSF is moving to a "more defined" framework?
That is pretty difficult to grasp. Could you explain?
On 9/6/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Walton, Kaleb (ISS Southfield) wrote the following on 9/9/2005 9:17 AM:
What do you mean by "inferior if you are interested in performance". Is
the overhead of the dialog/navigation processing pretty high?
Oh no:) Here we go again:)...
JSF sucks.
No, Sruts sucks.
Spring rules.
No, Spring suck
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:19 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: JSF -> Shale transition
>
> Well, have you considered classic struts? Shale is really meant for
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:44 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JSF -> Shale transition
>
> Moving from Struts to JSF is moving to a "more defined" framework?
> That is pretty difficult to gra
Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/08/2005 04:18:46 PM:
> Well, have you considered classic struts? Shale is really meant for
> people who are trying to change an application from JSF to Struts,
--do you really mean this?.. Even if you actually instead meant to say
"from Struts to JSF
ent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:44 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JSF -> Shale transition
>
> Moving from Struts to JSF is moving to a "more defined" framework?
> That is pretty difficult to grasp. Could you explain?
>
>
page transitions, forwarding, etc.
Regards,
Kaleb
-Original Message-
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:44 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JSF -> Shale transition
Moving from Struts to JSF is moving to a "
Moving from Struts to JSF is moving to a "more defined" framework?
That is pretty difficult to grasp. Could you explain?
On 9/6/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/6/05, Walton, Kaleb (ISS Southfield) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > As I had mentioned in
On 9/6/05, Walton, Kaleb (ISS Southfield) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> As I had mentioned in a previous post, our team is looking to move
> towards a more well defined web framework. From my limited experience
> using Shale (ran the shale-use-cases) I'm not feeling very confident
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
