Ted, Graig,
So was Struts Shale made to make programmer's life easier in creating
Web Applications using MVC Framework? I've read some posts/blogs where
people who've used Struts and now use Tapestry say that they will never
go back to Struts again. Is this what Struts Shale tries to
I know you asked Ted/Craig but Tapestry is a Apache project, like
Struts, a good framework that is View centric, home page says:
Tapestry is an alternative to scripting environments such as JavaServer
Pages or Velocity
Accroding to latest market share reportring (by Raible) Struts is like
70%
Well I think 70% is a little bit too much
http://www.manageability.org/polls/what-is-the-best-java-web-framework
Accroding to latest market share reportring (by Raible) Struts is
like 70% of market share. (Having said that, I wish that people that use
Struts becuase it's popular go
This should have been a quote:
Accroding to latest market share reportring (by Raible) Struts is
like 70% of market share. (Having said that, I wish that people that use
Struts becuase it's popular go away, one should use own judgment; if
everyone used EJB, would you use that too? or would
Alex Kravets wrote:
Well I think 70% is a little bit too much
http://www.manageability.org/polls/what-is-the-best-java-web-framework
Yup, agree.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-userm=98268169919293w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-userm=97660305929382w=2
Here are some other
I guess it depends on which group of 700 people you ask, and also how
you ask the question:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2004/05/19/2004-survey.html
What are you using? (the question asked by OnJava, and is what
market share would be based on) is different from What is the best?
(asked by
hihi all,
just want to add my 2 cents
i think it's simply a time issue. if i had time, naturally i'd like to
evaluate all possible choices before deciding which framework to use.
but given the amount of framework spin-offs we have these days, it's a
luxury not many ppl will have.
think about
True. Choice is good. The whole notion of capitalism is based on this.
Choice is a product of competition, and when there is competition better
products come out as a result of competition between number of other
products. Indeed choice is good.
Woodchuck wrote:
hihi all,
just want to add my 2
I don't think anyone is out to prove or disprove anything.
Craig saw a cool way to implement a front controller for JavaServer Faces, so
he posted some proof-of-concept code. Other people starting making
contributions. A community is growing up around the codebase, so we made it a
subproject.
Ted,
I hope you don't think that we (well me at least) seem to be accusation
in our e-mails. That is not the case. I am just sharing my thoughts on
where this or that approach might lead in the future. It might sound
unappreciative when guys spend thousands of hours perfecting/making
better
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 13:31:28 -0500, Alex Kravets wrote:
Ted,
I hope you don't think that we (well me at least) seem to be
accusation in our e-mails. That is not the case. I am just sharing
my thoughts on where this or that approach might lead in the
future. It might sound unappreciative when
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:03:09 -0500, Alex Kravets wrote:
So what do you guys think?
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=31509
An important clarification we'll make to the FAQ is that by doing our job
right we mean not break backward compatibility in the ongoing 1.x series.
snip
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:50:13 -0500, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meanwhile, another potentially great framework has come along: Shale. Like
Struts, Shale is MVC web framework, but it doesn't share any code or
architectural hallmarks with Struts 1.x.
/ship
As Rod Johnson (the
Got it!
Don't worry, we learn quickly.
.V
Dakota Jack wrote:
snip
Please don't respond to this email ..
--
Forums, Boards, Blogs and News in RiA http://www.boardVU.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
@struts.apache.org
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Struts 2.0 or Struts 0.0? [or Struts 1.42
It says bellow that ... DHay at LexMark has signature of Dakota Jack if
I read it right in the post. (The 2 of them care then).
Also known as Michael McGrady
http://theserverside.com/user/userthreads.tss?user_id=439796 on the
server side as Dakota Jack.
Any more ?
If so, why?
Ah.. you may
Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: user@struts.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 2.0 or Struts 0.0? [or Struts 1.42?]
It says bellow that ... DHay at LexMark has signature
:
|
| Subject: Re: Struts 2.0 or Struts 0.0? [or Struts 1.42?]
|
---|
It says bellow
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:04:16 -0800, Dakota Jack wrote:
Please don't respond to this email by saying that those who do can
do anything they like. They can, of course, but that does not mean
it makes much sense except for marketing purposes for JSF. (I
personally think that this will just
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:12:49 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any comments, Craig? I know it's a bit flamy, but would be interested in
your perspective.
Shale actually follows Rod's advice about not mixing metaphors --
that's why it is NOT mixed in with Struts 1.x's
20 matches
Mail list logo
