On 7/6/05, Adam Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pity the poor noob who asked the original question! Little did he
suspect that he would spark off a dialog on advanced MVC design.
This debate has come up before and for me, it is one of the weak points
of struts - I remember a couple of years
Michael Jouravlev wrote the following on 7/6/2005 5:03 PM:
The action class
provides the event contract, while the action form does the dirty
work.
Well in this case the struts-config file would provide the contract and
you could simply use one ForwardAction for everything. You've
On 7/6/05, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/6/05, Adam Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now there is talk of Struts in the future containing ActionCommands
which can be substituted in place of Actions, and strung together in a
chain, and presumably can perform View-Controller
On 7/6/05, Rick Reumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Jouravlev wrote the following on 7/6/2005 5:03 PM:
The action class
provides the event contract, while the action form does the dirty
work.
Well in this case the struts-config file would provide the contract and
you could simply
On 7/6/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/6/05, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/6/05, Adam Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now there is talk of Struts in the future containing ActionCommands
which can be substituted in place of Actions, and strung
Shale may purloin the name Struts but their is no Struts to Shale at
all. Mark G. may or may not harm Struts (I don't think people are so
stupid as to let that influence their career decisions actually) but
Shale will kill Struts utterly, if Shale, which is very unlikely,
should be chosen to
6 matches
Mail list logo
